Cited by 86Marine and coastal plant biologyPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsMarine and coastal ecosystems

THE INTERACTION BETWEEN INORGANIC CARBON ACQUISITION AND LIGHT SUPPLY IN PALMARIA PALMATA (RHODOPHYTA)1

Kübler, Janet E., Raven, John A.·1995·Journal of Phycology

Abstract

The dependence of the carbon concentrating mechanism of Palmaria palmata (L.) Kuntze on the growth light level was examined 1) to determine whether or not there is a threshold photon flux density (PFD) at which the inorganic carbon uptake mechanism can operate and 2) to attempt to quantify the relative energetic costs of acclimation to the two different limiting factors, PFD and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration. Plants were grown at six PFDs: 5, 25, 50, 75, 95, and 125 μmol photons. m−2.s−1. Growth rates increased with increasing PFD from 5 to 50 μmol photons. m−2. s−1 and were light‐saturated at 75, 95, and 125 μmol photons. m−2. s−1 Values of δ13C increased continuously with increasing growth PFD and did not saturate over the range of light levels tested. Time‐resolved fluorescence characteristics indicated a progressive photoacclimation below 50 μmol photons. m−2. s−1. Analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence induction showed three levels of light use efficirncy associated with growth at 5 or 25, 50, and >75 μmol photons. m−2. s−1. The light‐haruesting efficiency was inversely proportional to the effectiveness of DIC acquisition in plants grown at the six PFDs. These data were interpreted to indicate that there is a physiological tradeoff between photosynthetic efficiency and bicarbonate use in this species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1995.00369.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lowering of photosynthetic efficiency with DIC enrichment was unexpected, as increased CO2 availability would mean less resources (i.e. ATP) were needed to procure HCO3- for photosynthesis.

    “The lowering of photosynthetic efficiency with DIC enrichment was unexpected, as increased CO2 availability would mean less resources (i.e. ATP) were needed to procure HCO3- for photosynthesis [39].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kübler, J. E., & Raven, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Kübler, Janet E.
Venue
Journal of Phycology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
369-375
ISSN
  • 0022-3646 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8817
OpenAlex
W2130080954
Cited by
86
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Phycology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
Palmaria palmata, CO2-concentrating mechanism, inorganic carbon uptake, bicarbonate, light acclimation, photon flux density, carbon isotope discrimination, chlorophyll fluorescence, light harvesting efficiency, red algae, photosynthetic efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review