The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Regional Economic Resilience to Disasters: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Water Service Disruptions*
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Recent natural and manmade disasters have had significant regional economic impacts. These effects have been muted, however, by the resilience of individual businesses and of regional markets, which refers to the inherent ability and adaptive responses that enable firms and regions to avoid potential losses. Computable general equilibrium (CGE) analysis is a promising approach to disaster impact analysis because it is able to model the behavioral response to input shortages and changing market conditions. However, without further refinement, CGE models, as well as nearly all other economic models, reflect only “business-as-usual” conditions, when they are based on historical data. This paper advances the CGE analysis of major supply disruptions of critical inputs by: specifying operational definitions of individual business and regional macroeconomic resilience, linking production function parameters to various types of producer adaptations in emergencies, developing algorithms for recalibrating production functions to empirical or simulation data, and decomposing partial and general equilibrium responses. We illustrate some of these contributions in a case study of the sectoral and regional economic impacts of a disruption to the Portland Metropolitan Water System in the aftermath of a major earthquake.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Cited by
A review of definitions and measures of system resilience
Hosseini, S., Barker, K., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 · Cited by 1,892
The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA
Cutter, S. L. (2016) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2 · Cited by 719
Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review
Hammond, M. J., Chen, A. S., Djordjević, S., Butler, D., & Mark, O. (2015) · Urban Water Journal · doi:10.1080/1573062x.2013.857421 · Cited by 698
Resilience and entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review
Korber, S., & McNaughton, R. B. (2018) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-10-2016-0356 · Cited by 533
Resilience of Transportation Systems: Concepts and Comprehensive Review
Zhou, Y., Wang, J., & Yang, H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2883766 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, A., & Liao, S.-Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Regional Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-112
- ISSN
- 0022-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9787
- OpenAlex
- W2047517539
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 65.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Regional Economic Resilience to Disasters: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Water Service Disruptions*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00365.x
- The paper
- Rose, A., & Liao, S.-Y. (2005). Modeling Regional Economic Resilience to Disasters: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Water Service Disruptions*. Journal of Regional Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00365.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.