The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lingua Franca English, Multilingual Communities, and Language Acquisition
Abstract
Firth and Wagner (1997) questioned the dichotomies nonnative versus native speaker, learner versus user, and interlanguage versus target language, which reflect a bias toward innateness, cognition, and form in language acquisition. Research on lingua franca English (LFE) not only affirms this questioning, but reveals what multilingual communities have known all along: Language learning and use succeed through performance strategies, situational resources, and social negotiations in fluid communicative contexts. Proficiency is therefore practice-based, adaptive, and emergent. These findings compel us to theorize language acquisition as multimodal, multisensory, multilateral, and, therefore, multidimensional. The previously dominant constructs such as form, cognition, and the individual are not ignored; they get redefined as hybrid, fluid, and situated in a more socially embedded, ecologically sensitive, and interactionally open model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Cited by
Ungar, M. (2011) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01067.x · Cited by 1,789
Codemeshing in Academic Writing: Identifying Teachable Strategies of Translanguaging
CANAGARAJAH, S. (2011) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01207.x · Cited by 1,662
Self-citationIdentity, language learning, and social change
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000309 · Cited by 1,168
Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca
Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., & Dewey, M. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000115 · Cited by 722
Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming
THORNE, S. L., BLACK, R. W., & SYKES, J. M. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x · Cited by 516
Focus on Multilingualism as an Approach in Educational Contexts
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2014) · Educational Linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7856-6_13 · Cited by 119
Nguyen, T. T. M., Marlina, R., & Cao, T. H. P. (2021) · Asian Englishes · doi:10.1080/13488678.2020.1717794 · Cited by 82
International students in Ontario secondary schools: Demystifying the stereotype
Schecter, S., & Merecoulias, M. (2023) · Comparative and International Education · doi:10.5206/cie-eci.v51i2.13973 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Canagarajah, S.
- Venue
- Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-29
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 923-939
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994203237
- Cited by
- 831
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 93.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.