The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta‐analysis can “fail”: reply to Kotiaho and Tomkins
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meta-analyses are compromised if the studies being synthesized do not reflect the true distribution of effect sizes.
“However, meta-analyses are compromised if the studies being synthesized do not reflect the true distribution of effect sizes [ 5 , 35 – 37 ].”
From The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Publication and related biases.
Song, Eastwood, Gilbody, Duley, & Sutton (2000) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta4100 · Cited by 427
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
- 10.2307/3546355 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x · DOI · Paper page
- Duvall S., 2000, A non‐parametric ‘trim and fill’ method of assessing publication bias in meta‐analysis, J. Am. Stat. Ass., 95, 89
- 10.1098/rspb.2001.1832 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1464793101005875 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960316.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02235-2 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.441 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2000.1072 · DOI
- 10.1086/303233 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 · Cited by 1,388
“However, meta-analyses are compromised if the studies being synthesized do not reflect the true distribution of effect sizes [5,35 – 37].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jennions, M. D., Møller, A. P., & Hunt, J.
- Corresponding author
- Jennions, Michael D.
- Møller, Anders P.
- Hunt, John
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-193
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W1976740118
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oikos (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- meta-analysis, evidence synthesis, ecological research, publication bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
