Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The interaction of plant genotype and herbivory decelerate leaf litter decomposition and alter nutrient dynamics

Open access
Schweitzer, Jennifer A., Bailey, Joseph K., Hart, Stephen C., Wimp, Gina M., Chapman, Samantha K., Whitham, Thomas G.·2005·Oikos

Abstract

We examined how plant genetic variation and a common herbivore (the leaf‐galling aphid, Pemphigus betae ) influenced leaf litter quality, decomposition, and nutrient dynamics in a dominant riparian tree ( Populus spp .). Based on both observational studies and a herbivore exclusion experiment using trees of known genotype, we found four major patterns: 1) the quality of galled vs non‐galled or gall‐excluded litter significantly differed in the concentration of condensed tannins, lignin, nitrogen and phosphorus; 2) the difference in litter quality resulted in galled litter decomposing at rates 34 to 40% slower than non‐galled litter; 3) plant genotype and herbivory had similar effects on the magnitude of decomposition rate constants; and 4) plant genotype mediated the herbivore effects on leaf litter quality and decomposition, as there were genotype‐specific responses to herbivory independent of herbivore density. In contrast to other studies that have demonstrated accelerated ecosystem properties in response to arthropod herbivory, our findings argue that herbivore‐induced secondary compounds decelerated ecosystem properties though their “after‐life” effects on litter quality. Furthermore, these data are among the first to suggest that genotype‐specific responses to herbivores can have a major impact on decomposition and nutrient flux, which likely has important consequences for the spatial distribution of nutrients at the landscape level. Due to the magnitude of these effects, we contend that it is important to incorporate a genetic perspective into ecosystem studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13650.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Schweitzer, J. A., Bailey, J. K., Hart, S. C., Wimp, G. M., Chapman, S. K., & Whitham, T. G.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-12
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
133-145
ISSN
  • 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0706
OpenAlex
W2067779878
Cited by
184
References
3
FWCI
14.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The interaction of plant genotype and herbivory decelerate leaf litter decomposition and alter nutrient dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13650.x
The paper
Schweitzer, J. A., Bailey, J. K., Hart, S. C., Wimp, G. M., Chapman, S. K., & Whitham, T. G. (2005). The interaction of plant genotype and herbivory decelerate leaf litter decomposition and alter nutrient dynamics. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13650.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.