Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparison of the species–time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups

P. White, Ethan, B. Adler, Peter, K. Lauenroth, William, A. Gill, Richard, Greenberg, David, M. Kaufman, Dawn, Rassweiler, Andrew, A. Rusak, James, D. Smith, Melinda, R. Steinbeck, John, B. Waide, Robert, Yao, Jin·2006·Oikos

Abstract

The species–time relationship (STR) describes how the species richness of a community increases with the time span over which the community is observed. This pattern has numerous implications for both theory and conservation in much the same way as the species–area relationship (SAR). However, the STR has received much less attention and to date only a handful of papers have been published on the pattern. Here we gather together 984 community time‐series, representing 15 study areas and nine taxonomic groups, and evaluate their STRs in order to assess the generality of the STR, its consistency across ecosystems and taxonomic groups, its functional form, and its relationship to local species richness. In general, STRs were surprisingly similar across major taxonomic groups and ecosystem types. STRs tended to be well fit by both power and logarithmic functions, and power function exponents typically ranged between 0.2 and 0.4. Communities with high richness tended to have lower STR exponents, suggesting that factors increasing richness may simultaneously decrease turnover in ecological systems. Our results suggest that the STR is as fundamental an ecological pattern as the SAR, and raise questions about the general processes underlying this pattern. They also highlight the dynamic nature of most species assemblages, and the need to incorporate time scale in both basic and applied research on species richness patterns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14223.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
P. White, E., B. Adler, P., K. Lauenroth, W., A. Gill, R., Greenberg, D., M. Kaufman, D., Rassweiler, A., A. Rusak, J., D. Smith, M., R. Steinbeck, J., B. Waide, R., & Yao, J.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
185-195
ISSN
  • 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0706
OpenAlex
W2150637233
Cited by
220
References
3
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of the species–time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14223.x
The paper
P. White, E., B. Adler, P., K. Lauenroth, W., A. Gill, R., Greenberg, D., M. Kaufman, D., Rassweiler, A., A. Rusak, J., D. Smith, M., R. Steinbeck, J., B. Waide, R., & Yao, J. (2006). A comparison of the species–time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14223.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.