Cited by 14Migration and Exile StudiesEnvironmental Movements and Political EcologyPolitical Economy and Marxism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exiles from a Future Land: Moving Beyond Coalitional Politics

Abstract

Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort invited for lung cancer screening in a socioeconomically deprived area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00482.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Okihiro G, 1994, Margins and Mainstreams: Asians in American Culture

Metadata

Authors
Armstrong, E., & Prashad, V.
Affiliations
  • Smith College (US)
  • Trinity College (US)
Venue
Antipode
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
181-185
ISSN
  • 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8330
OpenAlex
W2090691944
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Antipode (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Environmental Movements and Political Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
political alliances, political exclusion, political representation, social movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review