The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mesothelioma Among Brake Mechanics: An Expanded Analysis of a Case‐Control Study
Abstract
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has begun discussions to consider its assessment of asbestos toxicity related to mineral form and fiber size. Brake workers are typically exposed to short chrysotile fibers. To explore the mesothelioma risk among brake workers, considering other occupational exposures to asbestos, data from a study that was published previously were obtained and the analysis was extended. The National Cancer Institute provided data from a case‐control study of mesothelioma. Because many participants with a history of brake work also had employment in other asbestos‐related occupations, mesothelioma cases and controls were compared for a history of brake work, controlling for employment in eight occupations with potential asbestos exposure. A stratified analysis was also performed excluding those with any of the eight occupations. Possible interactions between brake work and other occupational exposures related to risk of mesothelioma were also examined. The odds ratio (OR) for employment in brake installation or repair was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.30–1.60) when controlled for insulation or shipbuilding. When a history of employment in any of the eight occupations with potential asbestos exposure was controlled, the OR was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.36–1.80). ORs did not increase with increasing duration of brake work. Exclusion of those with any of the eight exposures resulted in an OR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.01–4.71) for occupational brake work. There was no evidence of an interaction between brake work and other occupational exposures. These latter analyses were based on small numbers of exposed cases. The results are consistent with the existing literature indicating that brake work does not increase the risk of mesothelioma and adds to the evidence that fiber type and size are important determinants of mesothelioma risk.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Vianna and Polan [4], Spirtas et al. [49], and Welch et al. [53] combine the activity of brake lining work/repair with traditionally highly exposed asbestos activities (e.g., insulation, shipyard work); thus, any observed increase in risk cannot be attributed to automobile mechanic work or solely to chrysotile exposure, and instead is highly likely attributable to the other activities (e.g., [108]”
From Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data (2013) · cites this paper as [108]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- United States Federal Register, 2003, Peer consultation workshop on a proposed asbestos cancer risk assessment, Federal Register, 68
- Hodgson J., 2000, The quantitative risk of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure, Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 44, 565, 10.1016/S0003-4878(00)00045-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/PL00014627 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00312.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajim.4700100108 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0142(19801001)46:7<1650::AID-CNCR2820460726>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- Teta M. J., 1983, Mesothelioma in Connecticut, 1955–1977, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 24, 749
- 10.1093/annhyg/38.4.635 · DOI
- 10.1136/oem.52.11.775 · DOI
- Teschke K., 1997, Mesothelioma surveillance to locate sources of exposure to asbestos, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 88, 163, 10.1007/BF03403881 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200002)37:2<159::AID-AJIM1>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/annhyg/41.inhaled_particles_VIII.129 · DOI
- 10.1006/rtph.2001.1491 · DOI
- 10.1136/oem.51.12.804 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/annhyg/41.6.699 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb41097.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data
Goswami, E., Craven, V., Dahlstrom, D., Alexander, D., & Mowat, F. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10115629 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Hessel, P. A., Teta, M. J., Goodman, M., & Lau, E.
- Venue
- Risk Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 547-552
- ISSN
- 0272-4332
- 1539-6924
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesothelioma Among Brake Mechanics: An Expanded Analysis of a Case‐Control Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00458.x
- The paper
- Hessel, P. A., Teta, M. J., Goodman, M., & Lau, E. (2004). Mesothelioma Among Brake Mechanics: An Expanded Analysis of a Case‐Control Study. Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00458.x