The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence and Duration of Breastfeeding for Term Infants in Canada, United States, Europe, and Australia: A Literature Review
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Analysis of differences in the incidence and duration of breastfeeding across countries may provide information about practices that encourage breastfeeding. This comparative review examines variation in the incidence and duration of breastfeeding for term infants that has been reported in studies from Canada, the United States, Europe, and Australia. Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE (from 1966), CINHAL (from 1982), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Studies were limited to nonexperimental and observational research that addressed term infants (>37 weeks gestational age), performed in developed countries, written in the English language, and published since 1990. Additional studies were located from reference lists of meta‐analyses, systematic reviews, and previous articles. All studies that met study criteria were included in the review, regardless of the quality of methodology. Results: Although studies had methodological limitations that precluded conducting a formal systematic review or meta‐analysis, this comparative review revealed consistent differences among countries. For example, Europe and Australia reported a higher initiation and duration of breastfeeding term infants compared with Canada and the United States. Conclusions: Studies that examined reasons for a higher incidence and duration of breastfeeding term infants consistently document that women who initiate and continue to breastfeed are older, married, better educated, and have higher family incomes than women who do not breastfeed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Breastfeeding and Child Cognitive Development: New Evidence From a Large Randomized Trial
Kramer, M. S. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.5.578 · Cited by 1,016
Factors that positively influence breastfeeding duration to 6 months: A literature review
Meedya, S., Fahy, K., & Kable, A. (2010) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2010.02.002 · Cited by 604
Predictors of Breastfeeding Duration: Evidence From a Cohort Study
Scott, J. A., Binns, C. W., Oddy, W. H., & Graham, K. I. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1991 · Cited by 526
Haga, S. M., Ulleberg, P., Slinning, K., Kraft, P., Steen, T. B., & Staff, A. (2012) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-012-0274-2 · Cited by 169
A qualitative study of depressive symptoms and well‐being among first‐time mothers
Haga, S. M., Lynne, A., Slinning, K., & Kraft, P. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00950.x · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Callen, J., & Pinelli, J.
- Venue
- Birth
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-25
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285-292
- ISSN
- 0730-7659 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-536X
- OpenAlex
- W2010997968
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and Duration of Breastfeeding for Term Infants in Canada, United States, Europe, and Australia: A Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00321.x
- The paper
- Callen, J., & Pinelli, J. (2004). Incidence and Duration of Breastfeeding for Term Infants in Canada, United States, Europe, and Australia: A Literature Review. Birth. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00321.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.