Cited by 643Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCritical Race Theory in EducationRace, History, and American Society

“What Group?” Studying Whites and Whiteness in the Era of “Color-Blindness”

Lewis, Amanda E.·2004·Sociological Theory

Abstract

In this article I argue that despite the claims of some, all whites in racialized societies “have race.” But because of the current context of race in our society, I argue that scholars of “whiteness” face several difficult theoretical and methodological challenges. First is the problem of how to avoid essentializing race when talking about whites as a social collective. That is, scholars must contend with the challenge of how to write about what is shared by those racialized as white without implying that their experiences of racialization all will be the same. Second, within the current context of color-blind racial discourse, researchers must confront the reality that some whites claim not to experience their whiteness at all. Third, studies of whiteness must not be conducted in a vacuum: racial discourse or “culture” cannot be separated from material realities. Only by attending to and by recognizing these challenges will empirical research on whiteness be able to push the boundaries of our understandings about the role of whites as racial actors and thereby also contribute to our understanding of how race works more generally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00237.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Race as a set of identities, discursive practices, cultural forms, and ideological manifestations would not exist without racism.

    “Amanda Lewis (2004: 625) contends that ' race as a set of identities, discursive practices, cultural forms, and ideological manifestations would not exist without racism.'”

    From A Critical and Comprehensive Sociological Theory of Race and Racism (2016) · cites this paper as Lewis 2004

  • Racial ideologies provide ways of understanding the world that make sense of racial gaps in earnings, wealth, and health such that whites do not see any connection between their gain and others' loss.

    “Lewis explains: 'For an ideology to gain hegemony, … it must successfully naturalize the status quo. … Racial ideologies in particular provide ways of understanding the world that make sense of racial gaps in earnings, wealth, and health such that whites do not see any connection between their gain and others' loss' (Lewis 2004: 632-3).”

    From A Critical and Comprehensive Sociological Theory of Race and Racism (2016) · cites this paper as Lewis 2004

  • For an ideology to gain hegemony, it must successfully naturalize the status quo.

    “Lewis explains: 'For an ideology to gain hegemony, … it must successfully naturalize the status quo. … Racial ideologies in particular provide ways of understanding the world that make sense of racial gaps in earnings, wealth, and health such that whites do not see any connection between their gain and others' loss' (Lewis 2004: 632-3).”

    From A Critical and Comprehensive Sociological Theory of Race and Racism (2016) · cites this paper as Lewis 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, A. E.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Amanda E.
Venue
Sociological Theory
Published
2004-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
623-646
ISSN
  • 0735-2751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9558
OpenAlex
W2151662273
Cited by
643
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 27
FWCI
34.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
whiteness, colorblind racism, race, racialization, essentialism, white identity, racial discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review