Cited by 53RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryMicrobial Inactivation MethodsAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Nucleofection: a new, highly efficient transfection method for primary human keratinocytes*

Distler, Jörg H. W., Jüngel, Astrid, Kurowska‐Stolarska, Mariola, Michel, Beat A., Gay, Renate E., Gay, Steffen, Distler, Oliver·2005·Experimental Dermatology

Abstract

Transfection is an essential tool for numerous in vitro applications including studies of gene expression, promoter analysis, and intracellular signaling pathways and also for therapeutic strategies such as tissue engineering and gene therapy. However, transfection of primary cells including keratinocytes with common methods such as calcium phosphate, DEAE-dextran, liposome-mediated transfer, electroporation or viral vectors is problematic because of low transfection efficiency and the induction of terminal differentiation. Here we analyzed the use of nucleofection, a new, electroporation-based transfection method that enables the DNA to enter directly the nucleus, for the transfection of keratinocytes. Several different conditions were tested and optimized, resulting in a final transfection efficiency of 56% in primary human epidermal keratinocytes. This efficiency is superior to all non-viral transfection methods reported so far. The number of non-viable keratinocytes after nucleofection was low, varying between 14 and 16%. In contrast to other transfection protocols, nucleofection did not induce terminal differentiation in the transfected keratinocytes. In addition, nucleofection is a fast method, because the results can be analyzed within 7 h. In summary, nucleofection is a fast, easy and highly effective alternative for the transfection of primary human keratinocytes, which offers new opportunities for various research applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0906-6705.2005.00276.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Distler, J. H. W., Jüngel, A., Kurowska‐Stolarska, M., Michel, B. A., Gay, R. E., Gay, S., & Distler, O.
Affiliations
University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Distler, Oliver
Venue
Experimental Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-15
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
315-320
ISSN
  • 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0625
OpenAlex
W2009399500
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
nucleofection, transfection, primary human keratinocytes, epidermal keratinocytes, electroporation, transfection efficiency, terminal differentiation, non-viral gene delivery, keratinocyte viability
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Cell Nucleus, Cell Separation, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, DEAE-Dextran, Diamines, Coloring Agents, Flow Cytometry, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Liposomes, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Organic Chemicals, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Quinolines, Time Factors, Transfection, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Keratinocytes, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Electroporation, Benzothiazoles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review