Cited by 127Evolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Phylogeny, diversity, and classification of the Accipitridae based on DNA sequences of the RAG-1 exon

Griffiths, Carole S., Barrowclough, George F., Groth, Jeff G., Mertz, Lisa A.·2007·Journal of Avian Biology

Abstract

The avian family Accipitridae has historically been divided into subfamilies or tribes based on features such as general resemblance, feeding ecology, and behavior. Consequently, the monophyly of those groups has been questionable. Recently, three phylogenetic analyses of a majority of the genera have appeared, one based on osteology, one on DNA sequences from a single mitochondrial gene, and the third on mitochondrial plus nuclear DNA sequences, and the resulting phylogenies were in substantial disagreement concerning the composition and basal branching patterns of the clades and hence require further analysis and confirmation. Here we use DNA sequences from the large nuclear RAG-1 exon to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of these birds. Our results largely corroborated the prior study that included nuclear genes. We found strong support for a monophyletic clade comprising the secretarybird Sagittarius serpentarius, the osprey Pandion haliaetus, and the traditional accipitrids. However, every one of the traditionally recognized subfamilies of accipitrids was found to be polyphyletic. The most basal nodes in the phylogeny separate small clades of insectivorous and scavenger species, such as kites and Old World vultures, from the rest of the family. The speciose genera of bird and mammal predators are all relatively derived (terminal) in the phylogeny. Many of the basal clades are cosmopolitan in their distributions, consistent with the great mobility of these raptor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2007.03971.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffiths, C. S., Barrowclough, G. F., Groth, J. G., & Mertz, L. A.
Affiliations
Long Island University (US)
Venue
Journal of Avian Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
587-602
ISSN
  • 0908-8857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-048X
OpenAlex
W1991291797
Cited by
127
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Avian Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • American Museum of Natural History
  • Long Island University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Accipitridae, raptors, phylogeny, monophyly, subfamily classification, polyphyly, Sagittarius serpentarius, Pandion haliaetus, kites, Old World vultures, avian predators, molecular phylogeny, taxonomic revision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review