The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of the mineral content and morphological pattern of artificial root caries lesion on composite resin bond strength
Abstract
Dentine substrates with different mineral contents and morphological patterns were created by submitting root slabs to the following treatments: (A) immersion in artificial saliva during the experimental period (control), (B) demineralization for 32 h to induce caries lesion (demineralized group), and (C) demineralization for 32 h followed by remineralization for 8 d (remineralized group). The slabs were longitudinally sectioned, the mineral content was determined by cross‐sectional microhardness, and the bond strength of an adhesive system/composite resin was assessed using a microtensile bond strength test. The dentine morphology after the treatments as well as the failure pattern of the debonded specimens was examined by scanning electron microscopy. Statistically significant differences were found in mineral content. Morphological analysis showed marked differences between the patterns of demineralized and remineralized substrates. The bond strength mean value of the control A did not differ from the group B, but was statistically higher than the group C. Since no linear relationship was found between dentine mineral content and bond strength values, it could be suggested that the morphological pattern may be more relevant than the mineral content to explain the bond strength of composite resin to dentine.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“About the use of surface hardness as indicator of dentine mineral loss, it has been widely employed [25, 33, 34, 36, 39, 56–59] because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography [25], which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine [60].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Perdigão J, 2000, New trends in dentine/enamel adhesion, Am J Dent, 13, S25
- 10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0104 · DOI
- 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00065-6 · DOI
- 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398 · DOI
- Giannini M, 2001, The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentine on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentine, J Adhes Dent, 3, 315
- 10.1016/0003-9969(87)90085-9 · DOI
- 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0307 · DOI
- Nyvad B, 1986, Active root surface caries converted into inactive caries as a response to oral hygiene, Scand J Dent Res, 94, 281
- Fejerskov O, 1994, Recent advancements in the treatment of root surface caries, Int Dent J, 44, 139
- Erickson RL, 1994, Root surface treatment with glass‐ionomer and resin composites, Am J Dent, 7, 279
- 10.1177/00220345940730010601 · DOI
- Xie J, 1996, Bond strength of composite to sound and artificial carious dentine, Am J Dent, 9, 31
- Yoshiyama M, 2000, Comparison of conventional vs. self‐etching adhesive bonds to caries‐affected dentine, Oper Dent, 25, 163
- 10.1177/00220345950740100901 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345960750061201 · DOI
- LeedyPD.Practical research: planning and design 6th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall 1997.
- 10.1159/000260692 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345950740060501 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345830620101501 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80021-2 · DOI
- 10.1159/000261198 · DOI
- Wefel JS, 1994, Root caries histopathology and chemistry, Am J Dent, 7, 261
- 10.1159/000261436 · DOI
- Sano H, 1995, Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer, Oper Dent, 20, 18
- 10.1177/154405910208100811 · DOI
- Yoshiyama M, 2003, Resin adhesion to carious dentin, Am J Dent, 16, 47
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hara, A. T., Queiroz, C. S., Giannini, M., Cury, J. A., & Serra, M. C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Oral Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-72
- ISSN
- 0909-8836
- 1600-0722
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review