Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Influence of the mineral content and morphological pattern of artificial root caries lesion on composite resin bond strength

Hara, Anderson T., Queiroz, Celso S., Giannini, Marcelo, Cury, Jaime A., Serra, Mônica C.·2004·European Journal of Oral Sciences

Abstract

Dentine substrates with different mineral contents and morphological patterns were created by submitting root slabs to the following treatments: (A) immersion in artificial saliva during the experimental period (control), (B) demineralization for 32 h to induce caries lesion (demineralized group), and (C) demineralization for 32 h followed by remineralization for 8 d (remineralized group). The slabs were longitudinally sectioned, the mineral content was determined by cross‐sectional microhardness, and the bond strength of an adhesive system/composite resin was assessed using a microtensile bond strength test. The dentine morphology after the treatments as well as the failure pattern of the debonded specimens was examined by scanning electron microscopy. Statistically significant differences were found in mineral content. Morphological analysis showed marked differences between the patterns of demineralized and remineralized substrates. The bond strength mean value of the control A did not differ from the group B, but was statistically higher than the group C. Since no linear relationship was found between dentine mineral content and bond strength values, it could be suggested that the morphological pattern may be more relevant than the mineral content to explain the bond strength of composite resin to dentine.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2004.00093.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Perdigão J, 2000, New trends in dentine/enamel adhesion, Am J Dent, 13, S25
  2. 10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0104 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00065-6 · DOI
  5. 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398 · DOI
  6. Giannini M, 2001, The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentine on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentine, J Adhes Dent, 3, 315
  7. 10.1016/0003-9969(87)90085-9 · DOI
  8. 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0307 · DOI
  9. Nyvad B, 1986, Active root surface caries converted into inactive caries as a response to oral hygiene, Scand J Dent Res, 94, 281
  10. Fejerskov O, 1994, Recent advancements in the treatment of root surface caries, Int Dent J, 44, 139
  11. Erickson RL, 1994, Root surface treatment with glass‐ionomer and resin composites, Am J Dent, 7, 279
  12. 10.1177/00220345940730010601 · DOI
  13. Xie J, 1996, Bond strength of composite to sound and artificial carious dentine, Am J Dent, 9, 31
  14. Yoshiyama M, 2000, Comparison of conventional vs. self‐etching adhesive bonds to caries‐affected dentine, Oper Dent, 25, 163
  15. 10.1177/00220345950740100901 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/00220345960750061201 · DOI
  17. LeedyPD.Practical research: planning and design 6th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall 1997.
  18. 10.1159/000260692 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/00220345950740060501 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/00220345830620101501 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80021-2 · DOI
  22. 10.1159/000261198 · DOI
  23. Wefel JS, 1994, Root caries histopathology and chemistry, Am J Dent, 7, 261
  24. 10.1159/000261436 · DOI
  25. Sano H, 1995, Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer, Oper Dent, 20, 18
  26. 10.1177/154405910208100811 · DOI
  27. Yoshiyama M, 2003, Resin adhesion to carious dentin, Am J Dent, 16, 47

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hara, A. T., Queiroz, C. S., Giannini, M., Cury, J. A., & Serra, M. C.
Venue
European Journal of Oral Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
67-72
ISSN
  • 0909-8836
  • 1600-0722
Cited by
19
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review