Cited by 129Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Constant Capacity in an Immediate Serial-Recall Task: A Logical Sequel to Miller (1956)

Cowan, Nelson, Chen, Zhijian, Rouder, Jeffrey N.·2004·Psychological Science

Abstract

We assessed a hypothesis that working memory capacity should include a constant number of separate mental units, or chunks (cf. Miller, 1956). Because of the practical difficulty of measuring chunks, this hypothesis has not been tested previously, despite wide attention to Miller's article. We used a training procedure to manipulate the strength of associations between pairs of words to be included in an immediate serial-recall task. Although the amount of training on associations clearly increased the availability of two-item chunks and therefore the number of items correct in list recall, the number of total chunks recalled (singletons plus two-word chunks) appeared to remain approximately constant across association strengths, supporting a hypothesis of constant capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00732.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cowan, N., Chen, Z., & Rouder, J. N.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2004-09
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
634-640
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2108661970
Cited by
129
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD-21338, R01HD021338)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
working memory capacity, chunking, Miller's law, serial recall, word association, associative strength, chunk size, training effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Logic, Male, Memory, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review