Cited by 552Social and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and Diversity

Knowing Is Half the Battle: Teaching Stereotype Threat as a Means of Improving Women's Math Performance

Johns, Michael, Schmader, Toni, Martens, Andy·2005·Psychological Science

Abstract

We tested whether informing women about stereotype threat is a useful intervention to improve their performance in a threatening testing situation. Men and women completed difficult math problems described either as a problem-solving task or as a math test. In a third (teaching-intervention) condition, the test was also described as a math test, but participants were additionally informed that stereotype threat could interfere with women's math performance. Results showed that women performed worse than men when the problems were described as a math test (and stereotype threat was not discussed), but did not differ from men in the problem-solving condition or in the condition in which they learned about stereotype threat. For women, attributing anxiety to gender stereotypes was associated with lower performance in the math-test condition but improved performance in the teaching-intervention condition. The results suggest that teaching about stereotype threat might offer a practical means of reducing its detrimental effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00799.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychoeducation programs explaining the role of social identity threat and suggesting coping strategies have been found to weaken the negative effects of stereotype threat.

    “Such programs have been found to weaken the negative effects of stereotype threat (O'Brien et al., 2019; see also Johns, Schmader, & Martens, 2005).”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Johns, Schmader, & Martens, 2005

  • Attributing underperformance to stereotype threat can benefit threatened students' performance.

    “Attributing the underperformance to stereotype threat, however, can benefit threatened students' performance (Johns et al., 2005;O'Brien et al., 2019)”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 15 · Cited by 552

Authors
Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Johns, Michael
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2005-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
175-179
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2123273638
Cited by
552
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 24
FWCI
65.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
stereotype threat, gender stereotypes, anxiety, problem-solving tasks, gender differences in performance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Aptitude, Aptitude Tests, Arousal, Educational Status, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Prejudice, Problem Solving, Self Concept, Set, Psychology, Statistics as Topic, Stereotyping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review