Knowing Is Half the Battle: Teaching Stereotype Threat as a Means of Improving Women's Math Performance
Abstract
We tested whether informing women about stereotype threat is a useful intervention to improve their performance in a threatening testing situation. Men and women completed difficult math problems described either as a problem-solving task or as a math test. In a third (teaching-intervention) condition, the test was also described as a math test, but participants were additionally informed that stereotype threat could interfere with women's math performance. Results showed that women performed worse than men when the problems were described as a math test (and stereotype threat was not discussed), but did not differ from men in the problem-solving condition or in the condition in which they learned about stereotype threat. For women, attributing anxiety to gender stereotypes was associated with lower performance in the math-test condition but improved performance in the teaching-intervention condition. The results suggest that teaching about stereotype threat might offer a practical means of reducing its detrimental effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychoeducation programs explaining the role of social identity threat and suggesting coping strategies have been found to weaken the negative effects of stereotype threat.
“Such programs have been found to weaken the negative effects of stereotype threat (O'Brien et al., 2019; see also Johns, Schmader, & Martens, 2005).”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Johns, Schmader, & Martens, 2005
Attributing underperformance to stereotype threat can benefit threatened students' performance.
“Attributing the underperformance to stereotype threat, however, can benefit threatened students' performance (Johns et al., 2005;O'Brien et al., 2019)”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Johns et al., 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 15 · Cited by 552
- Authors
- Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johns, Michael
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 175-179
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2123273638
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 65.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- stereotype threat, gender stereotypes, anxiety, problem-solving tasks, gender differences in performance
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Aptitude, Aptitude Tests, Arousal, Educational Status, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Prejudice, Problem Solving, Self Concept, Set, Psychology, Statistics as Topic, Stereotyping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review