Understanding Popularity in the Peer System
Abstract
Much research has focused on youth who are rejected by peers; who engage in negative behavior, including aggression; and who are at risk for adjustment problems. Recently, researchers have become increasingly interested in high-status youth. A distinction is made between two groups of high-status youth: those who are genuinely well liked by their peers and engage in predominantly prosocial behaviors and those who are seen as popular by their peers but are not necessarily well liked. The latter group of youth is well known, socially central, and emulated, but displays a mixed profile of prosocial as well as aggressive and manipulative behaviors. Research now needs to address the distinctive characteristics of these two groups and their developmental precursors and consequences. Of particular interest are high-status and socially powerful aggressors and their impact on their peers. The heterogeneity of high-status youth complicates the understanding of the social dynamics of the peer group, but will lead to new and important insights into the developmental significance of peer relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adolescence is marked by the introduction of a new form of peer status reflecting dominance, power, influence, and visibility.
“At the peer group level, adolescence is marked by the introduction of a new form of peer status, reflecting adolescents’ dominance, power, influence, and visibility (Cillessen & Rose 2005, Parkhurst & Hopmeyer 1998).”
From Adolescent Suicide as a Failure of Acute Stress-Response Systems. (2019) · cites this paper as Cillessen & Rose 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 18 · Cited by 561
- Authors
- Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cillessen, Antonius H.N.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-105
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2156974052
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 15.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- peer popularity, peer rejection, peer aggression, prosocial behavior, social power, peer relationships, youth development, peer group dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review