The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation*
Abstract
Biologists are still trying to grasp the global dimensions of the phylum Arthropoda and its major class the Insecta, in spite of the fact that over a million species of arthropods have been described. The canopy of rain forest trees is believed by many to hold the key to the immense diversity of insects. In recent years the use of knock-down insecticides to sample insects from rain forest canopy has revealed information on the canopy's arthropod inhabitants and community structure. The sampling techniques involved are outlined and data reviewed on taxonomic and guild structure, species abundance, body size and biomass of insects, and the faunal similarity of trees. Calculations by Erwin (1982), based on knock-down insecticide studies of the beetle fauna of one species of Central American tree, suggest there may be 30 million species of tropical forest arthropods. Reanalysis of these calculations, using additional data, produces a range of possible estimates from about 10 to 80 million. The unknown range of plant host-specificities of tropical insects is the main weakness of this method of calculation. Assessment of the faunal importance of the canopy in relation to that of other rain forest biotopes requires comparative quantitative studies. The preliminary results of one such simple study suggest that over 42 million arthropods may be found in a hectare of Seram rain forest (at the time of study), and that 70% occur in the soil and leaf litter and 14% in the canopy. They also suggest that Collembola and Acarina are the dominant groups in this hectare, and that there are as many ants as all the other insects (excluding Collembola).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Implications of Body Size
Peters, R. H. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511608551 · Cited by 5,649
Root, R. B. (1973) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942161 · Cited by 3,042
The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray Gnatcatcher
Root, R. B. (1967) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942327 · Cited by 1,806
Population density and body size in mammals
Damuth, J. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/290699a0 · Cited by 1,210
TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES
Erwin, T. L. (1982) · Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) · Cited by 950
Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths
Morse, D. R., Lawton, J. H., Dodson, M. M., & Williamson, M. H. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/314731a0 · Cited by 508
A new extractor for woodland litter
Kempson, D., Lloyd, M., & Ghelardi, R. (1963) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/s0031-4056(22)00112-3 · Cited by 472
Benedict, J. H. (1987) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/0167-8809(87)90031-4 · Cited by 417
The Guild Composition of Arthropod Communities in Trees
Moran, V. C., & Southwood, T. R. E. (1982) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4325 · Cited by 379
Body size, ecological dominance and Cope's rule
Brown, J. H., & Maurer, B. A. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/324248a0 · Cited by 372
Cited by
Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation
Colwell, R. K., & Coddington, J. A. (1994) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0091 · Cited by 4,530
The biomass distribution on Earth
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115 · Cited by 3,723
“Stork (197) measured the relative contribution of different habitats to the total biomass of arthropods and found litter, soil and canopy arthropods to be the main contributors to the arthropod biomass.”
BackgroundPimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., & Brooks, T. M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.347 · Cited by 2,230
Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: The Search for the Primary Cause
Rohde, K. (1992) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545569 · Cited by 1,623
How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth?
Stork, N. E. (2018) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348 · Cited by 1,537
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- STORK, N. E.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-337
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989133267
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00474.x
- The paper
- STORK, N. E. (1988). Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation*. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00474.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.