The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid- versus melanin-based coloration
Abstract
In birds, carotenoid-based plumage coloration is more dependent on physical condition and foraging abilities and less constrained developmentally than is melanin-based coloration. Thus, female mate choice for honest signals should result in more intense sexual selection on carotenoid- than on melanin-based plumage coloration. Using variation in sexual dimorphism as an indirect measure of the intensity of sexual selection, we tested the prediction mat variation in sexual dimorphism is driven more by change in carotenoid-based coloration between males and females than by change in melanin-based coloration. Examination of historical changes in carotenoid- versus melanin-based pigmentation in 126 extant species of Cardueline finches supported this prediction. We found that carotenoid-derived coloration changed more frequently among congeners than melanin-based coloration. In both sexes, increase in carotenoid-based coloration score, but not in melanin-based coloration score, was strongly associated with increase in sexual dichromatism. In addition, sexual dimorphism in carotenoid-based coloration contributed more to overall dichromatism than dimorphism in melanin-based plumage. Our results supported the hypothesis that melanin-based and carotenoid-based coloration have fundamentally different signal content and suggest that combining melanin-based and carotenoid-based coloration in comparative analyses is not appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Andersson, M. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207278 · Cited by 7,401
Mate selection—A selection for a handicap
Zahavi, A. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 · Cited by 5,251
Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?
Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7123238 · Cited by 3,733
Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285346 · Cited by 2,799
Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts
Garland, T., Harvey, P. H., & Ives, A. R. (1992) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · Cited by 2,151
Structure and properties of carotenoids in relation to function.
Britton, G. (1995) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.9.15.8529834 · Cited by 1,615
The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek
Kirkpatrick, M., & Ryan, M. J. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350033a0 · Cited by 1,316
The Biochemistry of the Carotenoids
Goodwin, T. W. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5542-4 · Cited by 1,007
Cited by
Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses
Hebets, E. A., & Papaj, D. R. (2005) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0865-7 · Cited by 958
The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration
Dale, J., Dey, C. J., Delhey, K., Kempenaers, B., & Valcu, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15509 · Cited by 391
Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses
Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-511 · Cited by 364
McGraw, K. J., & Hill, G. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1174 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BADYAEV, A. V., & HILL, G. E.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-172
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099579174
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 22.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid- versus melanin-based coloration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01196.x
- The paper
- BADYAEV, A. V., & HILL, G. E. (2000). Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid- versus melanin-based coloration. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01196.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.