The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using digital photography to study animal coloration: USING CAMERAS TO STUDY ANIMAL COLORATION
Open accessAbstract
In understanding how visual signals function, quantifying the components of those patterns is vital. With the ever-increasing power and availability of digital photography, many studies are utilizing this technique to study the content of animal colour signals. Digital photography has many advantages over other techniques, such as spectrometry, for measuring chromatic information, particularly in terms of the speed of data acquisition and its relatively cheap cost. Not only do digital photographs provide a method of quantifying the chromatic and achromatic content of spatially complex markings, but also they can be incorporated into powerful models of animal vision. Unfortunately, many studies utilizing digital photography appear to be unaware of several crucial issues involved in the acquisition of images, notably the nonlinearity of many cameras' responses to light intensity, and biases in a camera's processing of the images towards particular wavebands. In the present study, we set out step-by-step guidelines for the use of digital photography to obtain accurate data, either independent of any particular visual system (such as reflection values), or for particular models of nonhuman visual processing (such as that of a passerine bird). These guidelines include how to: (1) linearize the camera's response to changes in light intensity; (2) equalize the different colour channels to obtain reflectance information; and (3) produce a mapping from camera colour space to that of another colour space (such as photon catches for the cone types of a specific animal species).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abràmoff, M. D., Magalhães, P. J., & Ram, S. J. (2004) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 11,821
Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB
González, R. C., Woods, R. E., & Eddins, S. L. (2003) · Cited by 7,079
Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 · Cited by 6,510
Color Science, Concepts and Methods. Quantitative Data and Formulas
Wright, W. D. (1967) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/18/10/010 · Cited by 3,540
A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity
Thevenaz, P., Ruttimann, U. E., & Unser, M. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.650848 · Cited by 3,078
Nithianandan, P., Gardiner, B. G., & Hunter, J. E. (2006) · Cited by 1,845
On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns
ENDLER, J. A. (1990) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00839.x · Cited by 1,210
LYTHGOE, J. N. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,161
Animal colour vision — behavioural tests and physiological concepts
KELBER, A., VOROBYEV, M., & OSORIO, D. (2003) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793102005985 · Cited by 893
Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them: COLOUR PATTERN DIFFERENCES
ENDLER, J. A., & MIELKE, P. W. (2005) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00540.x · Cited by 753
Cited by
Troscianko, J., & Stevens, M. (2015) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12439 · Cited by 506
Self-citationImperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs
Barnett, J. B., Michalis, C., Anderson, H. M., McEwen, B. L., Yeager, J., Pruitt, J. N., Scott-Samuel, N. E., & Cuthill, I. C. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1919417117 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- STEVENS, M., PÁRRAGA, C. A., CUTHILL, I. C., PARTRIDGE, J. C., & TROSCIANKO, T. S.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01-31
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-237
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8312
- OpenAlex
- W1885077476
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using digital photography to study animal coloration: USING CAMERAS TO STUDY ANIMAL COLORATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00725.x
- The paper
- STEVENS, M., PÁRRAGA, C. A., CUTHILL, I. C., PARTRIDGE, J. C., & TROSCIANKO, T. S. (2007). Using digital photography to study animal coloration: USING CAMERAS TO STUDY ANIMAL COLORATION. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00725.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.