Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 655

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using digital photography to study animal coloration: USING CAMERAS TO STUDY ANIMAL COLORATION

Open access
STEVENS, MARTIN, PÁRRAGA, C. ALEJANDRO, CUTHILL, INNES C., PARTRIDGE, JULIAN C., TROSCIANKO, TOM S·2007·Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Abstract

In understanding how visual signals function, quantifying the components of those patterns is vital. With the ever-increasing power and availability of digital photography, many studies are utilizing this technique to study the content of animal colour signals. Digital photography has many advantages over other techniques, such as spectrometry, for measuring chromatic information, particularly in terms of the speed of data acquisition and its relatively cheap cost. Not only do digital photographs provide a method of quantifying the chromatic and achromatic content of spatially complex markings, but also they can be incorporated into powerful models of animal vision. Unfortunately, many studies utilizing digital photography appear to be unaware of several crucial issues involved in the acquisition of images, notably the nonlinearity of many cameras' responses to light intensity, and biases in a camera's processing of the images towards particular wavebands. In the present study, we set out step-by-step guidelines for the use of digital photography to obtain accurate data, either independent of any particular visual system (such as reflection values), or for particular models of nonhuman visual processing (such as that of a passerine bird). These guidelines include how to: (1) linearize the camera's response to changes in light intensity; (2) equalize the different colour channels to obtain reflectance information; and (3) produce a mapping from camera colour space to that of another colour space (such as photon catches for the cone types of a specific animal species).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00725.x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 655

Metadata

Authors
STEVENS, M., PÁRRAGA, C. A., CUTHILL, I. C., PARTRIDGE, J. C., & TROSCIANKO, T. S.
Venue
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Published
2007-01-31
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
211-237
ISSN
  • 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8312
OpenAlex
W1885077476
Cited by
655
References
53
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using digital photography to study animal coloration: USING CAMERAS TO STUDY ANIMAL COLORATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00725.x
The paper
STEVENS, M., PÁRRAGA, C. A., CUTHILL, I. C., PARTRIDGE, J. C., & TROSCIANKO, T. S. (2007). Using digital photography to study animal coloration: USING CAMERAS TO STUDY ANIMAL COLORATION. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00725.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.