CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Plant Surface Properties and TreatmentsPlant Ecology and Taxonomy StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SEM study of the inner periclinal surface of leaf cuticles in the family Pinaceae

MIRANDA, V., CHAPHEKAR, MRIGAWATI·1980·Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb00943.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Characters of the internal cuticle surface of 82 species of Pinaceae (ranging over nine genera) have been investigated using both light and SEM. Considerable variation is demonstrated in details of the intercellular flanges and in the fine sculpturing of the periclinal surface. Nine different sculpturing patterns are recognized. There is systematic value in this character; species within genera can usually be distinguished on the basis of cuticle structure, except in Cedrus and Larix.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb00943.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. ALVIN, 1970, Annual Symposium Scanning Electron, Microscopy
  2. ALVIN, 1974, A controlled method of comparative study for Taxodiaceous leaf cuticles, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 69, 217, 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1974.tb01631.x · DOI
  3. BAKER, 1970, The morphology and composition of isolated plant cuticles, New Phytologist, 69, 1053, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1970.tb02485.x · DOI
  4. BAKER, 1971, Ecology of Leaf Surface Micro-organisms
  5. BOULTER, 1970, Lignified guard cell thickenings in the leaves of some modern and fossil species of Taxodiaceae (Gymnospermae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2, 41, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1970.tb01685.x · DOI
  6. ROULTER, 1971, Scanning Electron. Microscopy: Systematic and Evolutionary applications
  7. FLORIN, 1931, Untersuchungen zur Stammesgeschichte der Coniferales und Cordaitales, l. Morphologie und Epidermisstruktur der Assimilations-organe beiden rezenten Koniferen, Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapaskademiens Handlingar, 10, 1
  8. HUTCHINSON, 1924, Contribution towards a phylogenetic classification of flowering plants, III. The genera of Gymnospermae, Kew Bulletin, 49
  9. JEFFREY, 1905, The comparative anatomy and Phylogeny of the Coniferales. Part 2. The Abietineae, Memoires. Boston Society of Natural History, 6, 1
  10. LANGE, 1969, Concerning the morphology of isolated plant cuticles, New Phytologist, 68, 423, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1969.tb06454.x · DOI
  11. MIRANDA , V. 1976 Epidermal and Cuticular Studies in the Family Pinaceae with Special Reference to Taxonomy M. Phil. Thesis
  12. PANT, 1977, A comparative study of the leaves of Cathaya argyrophylla Chun & Kuang and three species of Keteleeria Carriere, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 75, 271, 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1977.tb01488.x · DOI
  13. PILGER, 1926, Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien: Vol. XIII
  14. RUMIS, 1894, Contribution à l'étude de l'anatomie comparée du fruit des conifèrs, Annales des Sciences Naturelles Botanique, Série 7, 19, 165
  15. STOCKEY, 1978, Scanning electron microscopy of epidermal patterns and cuticular structure in genus Araucaria, Scanning Electron Microscopy, 2, 223
  16. TIEGHEM, 1891, Structure et affinitiés des Abies et des genres les plus voisins, Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France, 38, 406, 10.1080/00378941.1891.10828599 · DOI
  17. VIERHAPPER, 1910, Entwurf eins neuen systemes der Coniferen, Abhandlungen d. k. k. Zool.-Bot. Gesellschaft in Wein, 5, 1
  18. WETTSTEIN, 1924, Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik 3 Aufl

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Ecological and conceptual consequences of Arctic pollution

    Kirdyanov, A. V., Krusic, P. J., Shishov, V. V., Vaganov, E. A., Fertikov, A. I., Myglan, V. S., Barinov, V. V., Browse, J., Esper, J., Ilyin, V. A., et al. (2020) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13611 · Cited by 60

    “The deciduous larch habit minimises winter desiccation, whereas evergreen spruce develops thick cuticle to reduce foliar water loss (Miranda and Chaphekar, 1980).”
    Background

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
MIRANDA, V., & CHAPHEKAR, M.
Affiliations
University of Essex (GB)
ORCID
MIRANDA, V.
Venue
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1980-07
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
61-78
ISSN
0024-4074 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb00943.x
OpenAlex
W2094498234
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 12845 d)
Locations
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
Directorate for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
leaf cuticle, Pinaceae, cuticle morphology, taxonomic characters, cedar, larch, conifers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SEM study of the inner periclinal surface of leaf cuticles in the family Pinaceae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb00943.x
The paper
MIRANDA, V., & CHAPHEKAR, M. (1980). SEM study of the inner periclinal surface of leaf cuticles in the family Pinaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb00943.x