The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Visual Responses of Flying Mosquitoes.
Abstract
Summary.: 1. Observations were made on females of the yellow‐fever mosquito, Aedes (Stegomyia) wgypti, which had not had a blood meal. 2. When suspended by a silk fibre they orientated inaccurately but consistently away from the source of an horizontal beam of artificial light. 3. They orientated accurately towards a vertical black stripe on a white background, and would rotate maintaining this position when the stripe was rotated around them up to 25 revolutions per minute. 4. Presented with two black stripes the mosquitoes faced one or other stripe, and not between the two. Light stimulation of the front part of the eye evoked a more powerful turning‐away response than stimulation of the sides. 5. The mosquitoes were attracted by and followed stripes which were moving, abandoning stationary similarly striped or darker walls to do so. 6. Unsuspended, freely flying mosquitoes in a wind tunnel orientated consistently up wind, keeping position or making headway as long as the background was visible, but not in darkness. Without a wind, but with transverse stripes moving along the floor, they flew with or ahead of the stripe movement, the visual equivalent of flying up wind. 7. The above evidence that up wind orientation involves a visual “compensation” mechanism is discussed, and a theory of the mechanism put forward. 8. The lateral ommatidia initiate the responses to light and to moving objects, working in a different way from the dorsal and ventral ommatidia, which are concerned in up wind orientation. Interplay between the two classes of response may take place. The work was carried out in the Department of Entomology of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, during my tenure of the Avebury Studentship. I wish to thank Professor P. A. Buxton and all the members of his department, especially Dr. V. B. Wigglesworth, for their hospitality and fruitful suggestions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor
Cardé, R. T., & Willis, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9484-5 · Cited by 483
Visual and olfactory responses of haematophagous Diptera to host stimuli
Gibson, G., & Torr, S. J. (1999) · Medical and Veterinary Entomology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2915.1999.00163.x · Cited by 320
ARNOLD, G. P. (1974) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1974.tb01173.x · Cited by 257
Free-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors
Budick, S. A., & Dickinson, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02305 · Cited by 218
Plume-Tracking Behavior of Flying Drosophila Emerges from a Set of Distinct Sensory-Motor Reflexes
van Breugel, F., & Dickinson, M. H. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.023 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennedy, J. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1940-01
- Volume
- A109
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-242
- ISSN
- 0370-2774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087413700
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Visual Responses of Flying Mosquitoes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1940.tb00831.x
- The paper
- Kennedy, J. S. (1940). The Visual Responses of Flying Mosquitoes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1940.tb00831.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.