The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dependence of Mechanical Strength of Brittle Polycrystalline Specimens on Porosity and Grain Size
Abstract
An empirical equation form, approximating the apparent dependence of the strength of brittle polycrystalline specimens on the combined effect of porosity and grain size, has been developed from concepts and data in the literature. The form is shown to be applicable to data for thoria and chromium carbide specimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Cited by
Flexural strength and porosity of cements
Birchall, J. D., Howard, A. J., & Kendall, K. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/289388a0 · Cited by 438
Young's modulus of porous materials: Part 1 Theoretical derivation of modulus-porosity correlation
Wang, J. C. (1984) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/bf00540451 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- KNUDSEN, F. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Ceramic Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1959-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 376-387
- ISSN
- 0002-7820 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-2916
- OpenAlex
- W2107023154
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dependence of Mechanical Strength of Brittle Polycrystalline Specimens on Porosity and Grain Size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb13596.x
- The paper
- KNUDSEN, F. P. (1959). Dependence of Mechanical Strength of Brittle Polycrystalline Specimens on Porosity and Grain Size. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb13596.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
