Cited by 46Photodynamic Therapy Research StudiesNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesDermatology and Skin Diseases

Immunosuppressive effects of photodynamic therapy by topical aminolevulinic acid

HAYAMI, Junji, OKAMOTO, Hiroyuki, SUGIHARA, Akira, HORIO, Takeshi·2007·The Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been used for inflammatory skin disorders as well as superficial skin cancers such as solar keratosis and Bowen's disease. Whether PDT with topical application of aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and exposure to visible light has a similar immunosuppressive action to ultraviolet phototherapy was investigated using a murine contact hypersensitivity (CHS) model. The number of epidermal Langerhans cells (LC) was decreased with their morphological changes 1 day after PDT with the minimal level at 5 days and gradual recovery thereafter. Conversely, the number of CD11c+ I‐A+ cells was significantly increased in the draining lymph nodes after PDT. This suggests that LC moved from PDT‐treated skin, resulting in the decrement of epidermal LC and migration to lymph nodes. CHS response to DNFB applied on the PDT‐treated skin with 20% ALA and 40 J/cm 2 visible light was significantly suppressed (local immunosuppression). When mice were treated with 80 J/cm 2 of PDT, CHS response to the antigen applied on untreated distant skin was also significantly suppressed (systemic immunosuppression). The locally or systemically immunosuppressed mice by PDT were attempted to sensitize again with DNFB on non‐treated skin, but elicitation responses were significantly suppressed. However, these mice were able to be sensitized with another hapten, oxasolone. Thus, a hapten‐specific immunological unresponsiveness (tolerance) was induced in mice by topical ALA‐PDT. These findings suggest that PDT has a potential immunological contribution to clinical efficacy for inflammatory diseases identical to ultraviolet phototherapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00280.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HAYAMI, J., OKAMOTO, H., SUGIHARA, A., & HORIO, T.
Affiliations
Kansai Medical University (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-04
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
320-327
ISSN
  • 0385-2407 (ISSN-L)
  • 1346-8138
OpenAlex
W1506057026
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
photodynamic therapy, 5-aminolevulinic acid, topical application, immunosuppression, contact hypersensitivity, Langerhans cells, Langerhans cell migration, draining lymph nodes, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, hapten-specific tolerance, ultraviolet therapy, inflammatory skin diseases, visible light
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Aminolevulinic Acid, Animals, Cell Survival, Dermatitis, Contact, Female, Immune Tolerance, Langerhans Cells, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Photochemotherapy, Photosensitizing Agents, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review