The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Serum phytoestrogens and prostate cancer risk in a nested case‐control study among Japanese men
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine whether a high serum concentration of phytoestrogens reduces the risk of prostate cancer in a case‐control study nested in a community‐based cohort in Japan (Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study). Information on lifestyles and sera of the subjects were collected in 1988–90, and they were followed up to 1999. Incident and dead cases of prostate cancer and controls were matched for study area and age. Phytoestrogens and sex hormones in sera stored at −80°C were measured in 2002. Of 14,105 male subjects of the cohort who donated their sera, 52 cases and 151 controls were identified. Three datasets were analyzed; 1) all subjects, 2) 40 cases and 101 controls after excluding subjects with low testosterone levels who were suspected of having had medical intervention, and 3) 28 cases and 69 controls with prostate specific antigen level of ∼10.0 ng/ml. The odds ratio (OR) for the highest level to the lowest was 0.38 (95% confidence interval (CI); 0.13, 1.13) for genistein, 0.41 (0.15, 1.11) for daidzein, and 0.34 (0.11, 1.10) for equol for the second dataset. Genistein and daidzein showed similar findings in the third one. Equol and equol/daidzein ratio showed consistent findings in all three datasets (OR=0.39, 95% CI; 0.13, 0.89, trend P=0.02 for the first dataset). Their effects seemed to be independent of serum sex hormones. In conclusion, serum genistein, daidzein, and equol seemed to dose‐dependently reduce prostate cancer risk. (Cancer Sci 2004; 95: 65–71)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sacks, F. M., Lichtenstein, A., Van Horn, L., Harris, W., Kris-Etherton, P., & Winston, M. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.171052 · Cited by 656
Dillingham, B. L., McVeigh, B. L., Lampe, J. W., & Duncan, A. M. (2005) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/135.3.584 · Cited by 55
Kang, J. S., Yoon, Y. D., Han, M. H., Han, S.-B., Lee, K., Park, S.-K., & Kim, H. M. (2007) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2006.12.004 · Cited by 45
McMullen, M. H., Hamilton-Reeves, J. M., Bonorden, M. J. L., Wangen, K. E., Phipps, W. R., Feirtag, J. M., & Kurzer, M. S. (2006) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2006.12.887 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Ozasa, K., Nakao, M., Watanabe, Y., Hayashi, K., Miki, T., Mikami, K., Mori, M., Sakauchi, F., Washio, M., Ito, Y., Suzuki, K., Wakai, K., & Tamakoshi, A.
- Venue
- Cancer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-71
- ISSN
- 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-7006
- OpenAlex
- W2026727054
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum phytoestrogens and prostate cancer risk in a nested case‐control study among Japanese men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03172.x
- The paper
- Ozasa, K., Nakao, M., Watanabe, Y., Hayashi, K., Miki, T., Mikami, K., Mori, M., Sakauchi, F., Washio, M., Ito, Y., Suzuki, K., Wakai, K., & Tamakoshi, A. (2004). Serum phytoestrogens and prostate cancer risk in a nested case‐control study among Japanese men. Cancer Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03172.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.