Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic alterations and signaling pathways in the evolution of gliomas

Ohgaki, Hiroko, Kleihues, Paul·2009·Cancer Science

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors. They account for more than 70% of all neoplasms of the central nervous system and vary considerably in morphology, location, genetic alterations, and response to therapy. Most frequent and malignant are glioblastomas. The vast majority (>90%) develops rapidly after a short clinical history and without evidence of a less malignant precursor lesion (primary or de novo glioblastoma). Secondary glioblastomas develop more slowly through progression from low‐grade or anaplastic astrocytoma. These glioblastoma subtypes constitute distinct disease entities that affect patients of different age, develop through distinct genetic pathways, show different RNA and protein expression profiles, and may differ in their response to radio‐ and chemotherapy. Recently, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations have been identified as a very early and frequent genetic alteration in the pathway to secondary glioblastomas as well as that in oligodendroglial tumors, providing the first evidence that low‐grade astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas may share common cells of origin. In contrast, primary glioblastomas very rarely contain IDH1 mutations, suggesting that primary and secondary glioblastomas may originate from different progenitor cells, despite the fact that they are histologically largely indistinguishable. In this review, we summarize the current status of genetic alterations and signaling pathways operative in the evolution of astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors. (Cancer Sci 2009; 100 2235–2241)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01308.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Louis DN, 2007, WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System
  2. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1337 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/jnen/64.6.479 · DOI
  4. 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070011 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3280895da8 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4309 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1996.tb00848.x · DOI
  8. 10.1097/00005072-199807000-00005 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00045.x · DOI
  10. 10.1074/jbc.272.5.2927 · DOI
  11. 10.1215/15228517-4-3-196 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00401-006-0186-1 · DOI
  13. Hermanson M, 1992, Platelet‐derived growth factor and its receptors in human glioma tissue: expression of messenger RNA and protein suggests the presence of autocrine and paracrine loops, Cancer Res, 52, 3213
  14. Reifenberger J, 1996, Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in oligodendroglial tumors, Am J Pathol, 149, 29
  15. 10.1097/00006123-199802000-00080 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/glia.440150311 · DOI
  17. 10.1101/gad.13.12.1501 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1093/emboj/17.17.5001 · DOI
  19. 10.1101/gad.8.15.1739 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/nar/23.14.2584 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2001.tb00388.x · DOI
  23. 10.1097/00005072-199702000-00009 · DOI
  24. Reifenberger G, 1993, Amplification and overexpression of the MDM2 gene in a subset of human malignant gliomas without p53 mutations, Cancer Res, 53, 2736
  25. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00170.x · DOI
  26. 10.1093/jnen/60.12.1181 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s004010050711 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/BF00295665 · DOI
  29. Devlin TM, 2006, Textbook of Biochemistry with Clinical Correlations
  30. 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30527 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s00401-008-0455-2 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080958 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1002/humu.20937 · DOI
  34. Rasheed BK, 1995, Chromosome 10 deletion mapping in human gliomas: a common deletion region in 10q25, Oncogene, 10, 2243
  35. 10.1007/BF00219686 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199805)22:1<9::AID-GCC2>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/labinvest.3780009 · DOI
  38. Fults D, 1998, Microsatellite deletion mapping on chromosome 10q and mutation analysis of MMAC1, FAS, and MXI1 in human glioblastoma multiforme, Int J Oncol, 12, 905
  39. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6693403 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61702-6 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/jnen/59.6.539 · DOI
  42. 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0961 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.0900571106 · DOI
  44. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3272 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/labinvest.3700223 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/jnci/90.19.1473 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00703-3 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00044.x · DOI
  49. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1796 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/gcc.2870050411 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/ijc.2910570207 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::AID-GCC1007>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.11.012 · DOI
  54. 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.636 · DOI
  55. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3414 · DOI
  56. 10.3171/jns.2000.92.6.0983 · DOI
  57. 10.1097/01.jnen.0000235118.75182.94 · DOI
  58. 10.1097/00005072-199803000-00005 · DOI
  59. 10.1002/ijc.21648 · DOI
  60. Godard S, 2003, Classification of human astrocytic gliomas on the basis of gene expression: a correlated group of genes with angiogenic activity emerges as a strong predictor of subtypes, Cancer Res, 63, 6613
  61. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0077 · DOI
  62. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4821 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208865 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207770 · DOI
  65. Huang H, 2000, Gene expression profiling of low‐grade diffuse astrocytomas by cDNA arrays, Cancer Res, 60, 6868
  66. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0127 · DOI
  67. 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8554 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/mutage/17.6.483 · DOI
  69. 10.1159/000077469 · DOI
  70. 10.1056/NEJMoa043331 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1056/NEJM200011093431901 · DOI
  72. 10.1159/000170088 · DOI
  73. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0392 · DOI
  74. 10.1007/s11060-006-9320-0 · DOI
  75. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2149 · DOI
  76. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4180 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/nature05236 · DOI
  78. 10.1186/1476-4598-5-67 · DOI
  79. Singh SK, 2003, Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors, Cancer Res, 63, 5821
  80. 10.1038/nature03128 · DOI
  81. 10.1038/labinvest.2008.57 · DOI
  82. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003655 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Ohgaki, H., & Kleihues, P.
Venue
Cancer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-11
Volume
100
Issue
12
Pages
2235-2241
ISSN
  • 1347-9032
  • 1349-7006
Cited by
355
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review