Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accumulation of p62/SQSTM 1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Open access
Inoue, Daisuke, Suzuki, Takashi, Mitsuishi, Yoichiro, Miki, Yasuhiro, Suzuki, Satoshi, Sugawara, Shunichi, Watanabe, Mika, Sakurada, Akira, Endo, Chiaki, Uruno, Akira, Sasano, Hironobu, Nakagawa, Takayuki, Satoh, Kennichi, Tanaka, Nobuyuki, Kubo, Hiroshi, Motohashi, Hozumi, Yamamoto, Masayuki·2012·Cancer Science

Abstract

p62/SQSTM 1 is a selective substrate of autophagy, and aberrant accumulation of p62 has been observed in various pathological conditions. To understand the roles p62 plays in non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we carried out immunohistochemical analyses of p62 expression in a cohort of patients with annotated clinicopathological data. As analyses of murine and human hepatocellular carcinomas suggested a correlation between p62 and Nrf2 accumulations, we also examined NRF 2 expression in the same cohort. The expression of NRF 2 and p62 was examined by immunohistochemical methods in 109 NSCLC cases, which included patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 72), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 31), and large cell carcinoma (n = 6). Accumulation of NRF 2 and p62 was detected in 34% and 37% of NSCLC patients, respectively. The accumulations of p62 and NRF 2 did not correlate with each other, but both were associated with worse lung cancer‐specific survival (P = 0.0003 for NRF 2; P = 0.0130 for p62). NRF 2 status had an impact on NSCLC prognosis irrespective of histology types, but p62 status did so particularly in adenocarcinoma (P = 0.037). Multivariate analysis indicated that positive immunoreactivities of NRF 2 and p62 were both independent factors predicting worse lung cancer‐specific survival (P < 0.0001 for NRF 2 and P = 0.04 for p62). This study revealed that both NRF 2 and p62 are independent prognostic factors for NSCLC. The prognostic impact of p62 status was pronounced in adenocarcinoma patients, suggesting that molecular mechanisms underlying cancer evolution differ between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. (Cancer Sci 2012; 103: 760–766)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02216.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Inoue, D., Suzuki, T., Mitsuishi, Y., Miki, Y., Suzuki, S., Sugawara, S., Watanabe, M., Sakurada, A., Endo, C., Uruno, A., Sasano, H., Nakagawa, T., Satoh, K., Tanaka, N., Kubo, H., Motohashi, H., & Yamamoto, M.
Venue
Cancer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-21
Volume
103
Issue
4
Pages
760-766
ISSN
  • 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-7006
OpenAlex
W1977721235
Cited by
204
References
9
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accumulation of p62/SQSTM 1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02216.x
The paper
Inoue, D., Suzuki, T., Mitsuishi, Y., Miki, Y., Suzuki, S., Sugawara, S., Watanabe, M., Sakurada, A., Endo, C., Uruno, A., Sasano, H., Nakagawa, T., Satoh, K., Tanaka, N., Kubo, H., Motohashi, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2012). Accumulation of p62/SQSTM 1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02216.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.