The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity of Self‐reported Alcohol Use: a literature review and assessment*
Abstract
Summary: Recently, there has been increased attention to the validity of self‐reported alcohol use. Yet, much of the literature appears to be inappropriately seeking the definitive answer to a relative question, e.g. are self‐reports of alcohol use valid?. The literature on the validity of self‐reported alcohol use was reviewed with a primary focus on concurrent criterion‐oriented validity. Validity studies using collateral reports, diaries, official records, different interviewing methods, laboratory tests and multiple measures were assessed. It is concluded that research on the validity of self‐reported alcohol use should emphasize the interactions of the respondent, the interviewer, the information being obtained and the context of the interview to determine under which conditions valid responses can be maximized. Further, research on validity should focus on specific processes involved in providing accurate responses. Emphasis should be placed on developing a range of strategies and determining their appropriateness for obtaining more accurate reports from specific populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its minimization.
Babor, T. F., Stephens, R. S., & Marlatt, G. A. (1987) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1987.48.410 · Cited by 488 · cited 3×
“Babor et al. (1987) also discussed procedures for enhancing validity and, in addition, suggested methods for detecting specific types of biases which may occur.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMaisto, S. A., Sobell, M. B., & Sobell, L. C. (1982) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/0376-8716(82)90066-7 · Cited by 57
Cited by
FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK
Kanis, J. A., Johnell, O., Oden, A., Johansson, H., & McCloskey, E. (2008) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0543-5 · Cited by 2,467
Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Kuo, M., Seibring, M., Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2002) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448480209595713 · Cited by 1,457
Brener, N. D., Billy, J. O. G., & Grady, W. R. (2003) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00052-1 · Cited by 1,331
Binge Drinking Among US Adults
Naimi, T. S., Brewer, R. D., Mokdad, A., Denny, C., Serdula, M. K., & Marks, J. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.1.70 · Cited by 987
Leigh, B. C., & Stall, R. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.48.10.1035 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- MIDANIK, L. T.
- Venue
- British Journal of Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1019-1029
- ISSN
- 0952-0481 (ISSN-L)
- 2056-5178
- OpenAlex
- W2145304188
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validity of Self‐reported Alcohol Use: a literature review and assessment*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb00526.x
- The paper
- MIDANIK, L. T. (1988). Validity of Self‐reported Alcohol Use: a literature review and assessment*. British Journal of Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb00526.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.