The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Retention in methadone maintenance and heroin addicts’risk of death
Abstract
A long‐term follow‐up was made of a cohort of 307 heroin addicts admitted into a high‐dose, Australian methadone maintenance programme in the early 1970s. Using data from clinic records, official death records and methadone treatment histories, it was found that subjects were nearly three times as likely to die outside of methadone maintenance as in it (95% CI RR 1.45 to 5.61). Data were further analyzed using Cox regression to investigate the association of maximum daily methadone dose and a change in clinic policy with retention in maintenance treatment. It is estimated that subjects given a maximum daily dose of 80 mg were nearly twice as likely to be discharged during the first three years of maintenance as those given 120 mg (95% CI RR 1.3 to 2.2). The estimated median time in maintenance for subjects given a maximum dose of 120 mg mas 1150 days while for 80 mg it was 660 days. It is further estimated that the change in clime policy from abstinence to indefinite maintenance reduced to one‐third subjects’risk of leaving after three years’of treatment (95% CI RR 0.19 to 0.54). It is concluded that, in order to minimise heroin addicts’risk of death, they should be offered indefinite, high‐dose methadone maintenance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sordo, L., Barrio, G., Bravo, M. J., Indave, B. I., Degenhardt, L., Wiessing, L., Ferri, M., & Pastor-Barriuso, R. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j1550 · Cited by 1,816
Amato, L., Davoli, M., A.Perucci, C., Ferri, M., Faggiano, F., & P. Mattick, R. (2005) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2005.02.007 · Cited by 567
Guidelines for the psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence
Uchtenhagen, A. (2009) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-17408 · Cited by 490
Heroin Overdose: Research and Evidence-Based Intervention
Darke, S. (2003) · Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jurban/jtg022 · Cited by 332
Central Sleep Apnea in Stable Methadone Maintenance Treatment Patients
Wang, D., Teichtahl, H., Drummer, O., Goodman, C., Cherry, G., Cunnington, D., & Kronborg, I. (2005) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.128.3.1348 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- CAPLEHORN, J. R. M., DALTON, M. S. Y. N., CLUFF, M. C., & PETRENAS, A.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-207
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2066784402
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retention in methadone maintenance and heroin addicts’risk of death. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00879.x
- The paper
- CAPLEHORN, J. R. M., DALTON, M. S. Y. N., CLUFF, M. C., & PETRENAS, A. (1994). Retention in methadone maintenance and heroin addicts’risk of death. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00879.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.