Cited by 102Smoking Behavior and CessationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Acute effects of a guided relaxation routine (body scan) on tobacco withdrawal symptoms and cravings in abstinent smokers

Cropley, Mark, Ussher, Michael, Charitou, Elli·2007·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To examine the acute effects of a guided relaxation routine (body scan) on desire to smoke and tobacco withdrawal symptoms in overnight abstinent smokers. Design Experimental. Participants Thirty individuals reporting to smoke 10 or more cigarettes daily for at least 3 years. Intervention Participants were assigned randomly to complete a 10‐minute body scan (experimental group n = 15) or listen to a natural history passage for 10 minutes (control group n = 15). Measurement Ratings of strength of desire to smoke and smoking withdrawal symptoms were assessed at baseline, immediately after the interventions, and 5, 10 and 15 minutes post‐intervention. Findings There was a significant group × time interaction for strength of desire to smoke. The mean desire to smoke rating was significantly lower in the body scan group relative to the control group immediately after the intervention, and 5 minutes post‐intervention. The body scan group also reported lower ratings of irritability, tension and restlessness, relative to the controls. Conclusion A brief body scan intervention reduces strength of desire to smoke and some tobacco withdrawal symptoms in temporarily abstaining smokers. The body scan may be beneficial as a technique for managing cigarette cravings and withdrawal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01832.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 102

Authors
Cropley, M., Ussher, M., & Charitou, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Cropley, Mark
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-22
Volume
102
Issue
6
Pages
989-993
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2098627890
Cited by
102
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
body scanning, guided relaxation, tobacco withdrawal symptoms, cigarette craving, nicotine craving, smoking cessation, nicotine abstinence, irritability, tension, restlessness
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Relaxation Therapy, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Smoking Cessation, Behavior, Addictive, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review