Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Influence of traditional tobacco use on smoking cessation among American Indians

Daley, Christine M., Faseru, Babalola, Nazir, Niaman, Solomon, Cheree, Greiner, K. Allen, Ahluwalia, Jasjit S., Choi, Won S.·2011·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To examine the influence of traditional tobacco use on smoking cessation among American Indian adult smokers. Design, setting and participants A cross‐sectional survey of self‐identified American Indians was conducted from 2008 to 2009. A total of 998 American Indian adults (18 years and older) from the Midwest participated in the study. Measurements Traditional tobacco use and method of traditional use were both assessed. Commercial tobacco use (current smoking) was obtained through self‐reported information as well as the length of their most recent quit attempt. We also assessed knowledge and awareness of pharmacotherapy for current smokers. Findings Among participants in our study, 33.3% were current smokers and they reported smoking an average of 10 cigarettes per day. American Indian current smokers who used traditional tobacco reported a greater number of days abstinent during their last quit attempt compared to those who do not use traditional tobacco (P = 0.01). However, it appears that this protective effect of traditional tobacco use is diminished if the person smokes traditional tobacco. Finally, very few (fewer than 20% of current smokers) were aware of more recent forms of pharmacotherapy such as Chantix or bupropion. Conclusions American Indians appear to show low levels of awareness of effective pharmacotherapies to aid smoking cessation, but those who use ‘traditional tobacco’ report somewhat longer periods of abstinence from past quit attempts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03391.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Denny C. H., 2003, Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives. Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997–2000, MMWR Surveill Summ, 52, 1
  2. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.050096 · DOI
  3. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.155473 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/003335490512000214 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/pubmed/fdp104 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/her/15.5.547 · DOI
  7. 10.1056/NEJMp058095 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF01350256 · DOI
  9. Fiore M., 2000, Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: Clinical Practice Guideline
  10. 10.1001/jama.299.17.2083 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/14651858.CD001837.pub2 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.04.024 · DOI
  14. 10.7326/0003-4819-145-11-200612050-00142 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.007 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.033 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.009 · DOI
  18. 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092577 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/14622200601083426 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Daley, C. M., Faseru, B., Nazir, N., Solomon, C., Greiner, K. A., Ahluwalia, J. S., & Choi, W. S.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-08
Volume
106
Issue
5
Pages
1003-1009
ISSN
  • 0965-2140
  • 1360-0443
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review