Cited by 77Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UseSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of intranasal crushed buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in opioid abusers

Open access
Middleton, Lisa S., Nuzzo, Paul A., Lofwall, Michelle R., Moody, David E., Walsh, Sharon L.·2011·Addiction

Abstract

AIMS: Sublingual buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are efficacious opioid dependence pharmacotherapies, but there are reports of their diversion and misuse by the intranasal route. The study objectives were to characterize and compare their intranasal pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. SETTING: An in-patient research unit at the University of Kentucky. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy adults (n = 10) abusing, but not physically dependent on, intranasal opioids. MEASUREMENTS: Six sessions (72 hours apart) tested five intranasal doses [0/0, crushed buprenorphine (2, 8 mg), crushed buprenorphine/naloxone (2/0.5, 8/2 mg)] and one intravenous dose (0.8 mg buprenorphine/0.2 mg naloxone for bioavailability assessment). Plasma samples, physiological, subject- and observer-rated measures were collected before and for up to 72 hours after drug administration. FINDINGS: Both formulations produced time- and dose-dependent increases on subjective and physiological mu-opioid agonist effects (e.g. 'liking', miosis). Subjects reported higher subjective ratings and street values for 8 mg compared to 8/2 mg, but these differences were not statistically significant. No significant formulation differences in peak plasma buprenorphine concentration or time-course were observed. Buprenorphine bioavailability was 38-44% and T(max) was 35-40 minutes after all intranasal doses. Naloxone bioavailability was 24% and 30% following 2/0.5 and 8/2 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to determine if observed differences in abuse potential between intranasal buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are clinically relevant at the doses tested. Greater bioavailability and faster onset of pharmacodynamic effects compared to sublingual administration suggests a motivation for intranasal misuse in non-dependent opioid abusers. However, significant naloxone absorption from intranasal buprenorphine/naloxone administration may deter the likelihood of intranasal misuse of buprenorphine/naloxone, but not buprenorphine, in opioid-dependent individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03424.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 77

Authors
Middleton, L. S., Nuzzo, P. A., Lofwall, M. R., Moody, D. E., & Walsh, S. L.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Middleton, Lisa S.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-03
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
1460-1473
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1839254548
Cited by
77
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da016718-15, 1ul1rr033173-01, UL1TR000117, UL1TR001998)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA016176, R01-DA016718)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR-033173)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
buprenorphine/naloxone, drug diversion, abuse liability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, subjective drug effects
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Biological Availability, Buprenorphine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Tablets, Time Factors, Cross-Over Studies, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review