CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Secrets of the subterranean pathosystem of Armillaria

Open access
BAUMGARTNER, KENDRA, COETZEE, MARTIN P. A., HOFFMEISTER, DIRK·2011·Molecular Plant Pathology
DOI 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00693.xPMC PMC6640247
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

SUMMARY: Armillaria root disease affects fruit and nut crops, timber trees and ornamentals in boreal, temperate and tropical regions of the world. The causal pathogens are members of the genus Armillaria (Basidiomycota, Physalacriaceae). This review summarizes the state of knowledge and highlights recent advances in Armillaria research. Taxonomy: Armillaria includes more than 40 morphological species. However, the identification and delineation of species on the basis of morphological characters are problematic, resulting in many species being undetected. Implementation of the biological species' concept and DNA sequence comparisons in the contemporary taxonomy of Armillaria have led to the discovery of a number of new species that are not linked to described morphological species. Host range: Armillaria exhibits a range of symbioses with both plants and fungi. As plant pathogens, Armillaria species have broad host ranges, infecting mostly woody species. Armillaria can also colonize orchids Galeola and Gastrodia but, in this case, the fungus is the host and the plant is the parasite. Similar to its contrasting relationships with plants, Armillaria acts as either host or parasite in its interactions with other fungi. Disease control: Recent research on post‐infection controls has revealed promising alternatives to the former pre‐plant eradication attempts with soil fumigants, which are now being regulated more heavily or banned outright because of their negative effects on the environment. New study tools for genetic manipulation of the pathogen and characterization of the molecular basis of the host response will greatly advance the development of resistant rootstocks in a new stage of research. The depth of the research, regardless of whether traditional or genomic approaches are used, will depend on a clear understanding of where the different propagules of Armillaria attack a root system, which of the pathogen's diverse biolymer‐degrading enzymes and secondary metabolites facilitate infection, and how the course of infection differs between resistant and susceptible hosts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00693.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 218

  1. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1997.tb00863.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1997.tb00864.x · DOI
  3. 10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.3.240 · DOI
  4. 10.1023/B:EJPP.0000041553.98879.51 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/ps.1149 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0003-9861(62)90124-8 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/3807531 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02615.x · DOI
  9. 10.1080/00275514.1992.12026170 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/3759160 · DOI
  11. 10.1139/b82-059 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/3807745 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s11557-009-0597-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)85503-X · DOI
  15. 10.1002/jlac.199619961123 · DOI
  16. 10.1139/v87-002 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1574-4976.2005.00010.x · DOI
  18. 10.2307/3761321 · DOI
  19. 10.1042/bj1930737 · DOI
  20. 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.11.1235 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/00275514.2001.12063217 · DOI
  22. 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.9.947 · DOI
  23. Baumgartner K., 2002, Spread of Armillaria root disease in a California vineyard, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 53, 197, 10.5344/ajev.2002.53.3.197 · DOI
  24. Baumgartner K., 2006, Relative resistance of grapevine rootstocks to Armillaria root disease, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 57, 408, 10.5344/ajev.2006.57.4.408 · DOI
  25. 10.1094/PD-90-0439 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02494.x · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.11.003 · DOI
  28. 10.1094/PHYTO-100-7-0708 · DOI
  29. 10.1128/AEM.01049-10 · DOI
  30. 10.1139/b06-097 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/3760392 · DOI
  32. 10.1139/cjfr-30-3-507 · DOI
  33. Bérubé J.A., 1988, Morphological characterization of Armillaria ostoyae and Armillaria sinapina sp. nov, Can. J. Bot., 66, 2027, 10.1139/b88-277 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/3759703 · DOI
  35. 10.7202/706101ar · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80220-6 · DOI
  37. Bliss D.E., 1951, The destruction of Armillaria mellea in citrus soils, Phytopathology, 41, 665
  38. 10.1046/j.1439-0329.2000.00185.x · DOI
  39. 10.2307/3762034 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80520-0 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1995.tb01347.x · DOI
  42. 10.1139/b99-170 · DOI
  43. 10.2323/jgam.43.23 · DOI
  44. 10.1017/S0953756297005315 · DOI
  45. 10.2307/3761435 · DOI
  46. 10.2307/3761454 · DOI
  47. 10.2307/3761754 · DOI
  48. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01187.x · DOI
  49. 10.2307/3762039 · DOI
  50. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00879.x · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01110.x · DOI
  52. Coetzee M.P.A., 2009, Characterisation of Armillaria species based on pectic isozyme analyses, Fungal Divers., 36, 9
  53. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.01.012 · DOI
  54. Curir P., 1997, Characterization of a laccase secreted by Armillaria mellea pathogenic for Genista, Plant Physiol. Biochem., 35, 147
  55. 10.2307/3761750 · DOI
  56. 10.1139/x02-141 · DOI
  57. 10.1039/b713328f · DOI
  58. 10.1139/cjb-79-5-600 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.mad.2010.03.001 · DOI
  60. 10.1039/c39820000135 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1992.tb01331.x · DOI
  62. 10.1093/jxb/36.7.1110 · DOI
  63. 10.1094/Phyto-81-89 · DOI
  64. 10.1094/Phyto-82-393 · DOI
  65. 10.1039/b208815k · DOI
  66. Fox R.T.V., 2000, Armillaria Root Rot: Biology and Control of Honey Fungus
  67. Fox R.T.V., 1989, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, 458
  68. 10.1017/S0953756203008633 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/S0367-326X(01)00319-7 · DOI
  70. 10.2307/3761177 · DOI
  71. 10.1139/m57-018 · DOI
  72. Gregory S.T., 1991, Armillaria Root Disease, 76
  73. 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1213 · DOI
  74. Gubler W.D., 1992, Grape Pest Management Edition 2, 92
  75. 10.1071/AP04019 · DOI
  76. Guillaumin J.J., 1973, Etude du cycle caryologique de deux especes appartenant au genre Armillariella, Ann. Phytopathol., 5, 317
  77. 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1977.tb02414.x · DOI
  78. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1985.tb01099.x · DOI
  79. Guillaumin J.J., 1989, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, 27
  80. Guillaumin J.J., 1989, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, 197
  81. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1993.tb00814.x · DOI
  82. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01900.x · DOI
  83. 10.2307/3760915 · DOI
  84. Harrington T.C., 1992, Methods for Research on Soilborne Phytopathogenic Fungi, 81
  85. Hartig R., 1874, Important Diseases of Forest Trees. Contributions to Mycology and Phytopathology for Botanists and Foresters
  86. 10.29203/ka.1973.80 · DOI
  87. Hood I.A., 1991, Armillaria Root Disease, 122
  88. Hood I.A., 2002, Armillaria root disease of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. 1: Basidiospore dispersal, N. Z. J. Forest Sci., 32, 94
  89. Hu Z., 1999, Primary structure and cDNA cloning of the antifungal protein GAFP‐I from Gastrodia elata, Acta Bot. Yunnan, 21, 131
  90. 10.1016/S0007-1536(87)80047-5 · DOI
  91. Jin W.S., 2000, Studies of the chemistry and pharmacology of Gastrodia elata, Chin. Trad. Drug Technol., 2, 21
  92. 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00399-5 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.01.002 · DOI
  94. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2008.00578.x · DOI
  95. Kikuchi G., 2008, In vitro symbiosis between Gastrodia elata Blume (Orchidaceae) and Armillaria Kummer (Tricholomataceae) species isolates from the orchid tuber, J. Jpn. Bot., 83, 77
  96. Kile G.A., 1981, Armillaria luteobubalina: a primary cause of decline and death of trees in mixed species eucalypt forests in central Victoria, Aust. Forest Res., 11, 63
  97. Kile G.A., 1983, Identification of genotypes and the clonal development of Armillaria luteobubalina Watling & Kile in eucalypt forests, Aust. J. Bot., 31, 657, 10.1071/BT9830657 · DOI
  98. 10.1016/S0007-1536(88)80219-5 · DOI
  99. Kile G.A., 1994, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, 411
  100. 10.29203/ka.1978.135 · DOI
  101. Korhonen K., 1983, Observations on nuclear migration and heterokaryotization in Armillaria, Crypt. Mycol., 4, 79, 10.5962/p.354144 · DOI
  102. 10.1007/BF02451760 · DOI
  103. 10.1139/x05-067 · DOI
  104. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.05.004 · DOI
  105. 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00204.x · DOI
  106. 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.03.006 · DOI
  107. Lung‐Escarmant B., 1979, Differentiation of Armillariella and Clitocybe species by the use of immuno‐enzymatic ELISA procedure, Ann. Phytopathol., 11, 515
  108. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1985.tb01100.x · DOI
  109. 10.1071/AP06056 · DOI
  110. 10.1007/s10310-004-0121-z · DOI
  111. 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)87383-9 · DOI
  112. 10.3852/mycologia.99.3.341 · DOI
  113. 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.10.011 · DOI
  114. Misiek M., 2011, Sesquiterpene‐aryl ester natural products in North American Armillaria species, Mycol. Prog.
  115. 10.1021/np900314p · DOI
  116. Mohammed C., 1994, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, 402
  117. 10.7164/antibiotics.53.137 · DOI
  118. 10.1016/S0007-1536(76)80207-0 · DOI
  119. 10.1046/j.1439-0329.2003.00345.x · DOI
  120. 10.1046/j.1439-0329.2002.00275.x · DOI
  121. 10.1080/07060668509501685 · DOI
  122. 10.1007/BF01237734 · DOI
  123. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1969.tb07577.x · DOI
  124. 10.2307/3793052 · DOI
  125. 10.2307/3807438 · DOI
  126. 10.1094/Phyto-60-992 · DOI
  127. 10.1094/Phyto-63-1352 · DOI
  128. 10.1094/PD-65-384 · DOI
  129. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-184.x · DOI
  130. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-30.x · DOI
  131. 10.1006/pmpp.1999.0210 · DOI
  132. 10.1017/S0953756203007408 · DOI
  133. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01347.x · DOI
  134. Nagel A.K., 2008, Generation and characterization of transgenic plum lines expressing the Gastrodia antifungal protein, HortScience, 43, 1514, 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1514 · DOI
  135. 10.1094/Phyto-63-965 · DOI
  136. 10.2307/3761398 · DOI
  137. 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.5.537 · DOI
  138. 10.1017/S0953756200002550 · DOI
  139. 10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00174-6 · DOI
  140. 10.1016/j.mycres.2005.09.006 · DOI
  141. 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1187 · DOI
  142. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81262-8 · DOI
  143. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80755-7 · DOI
  144. 10.1515/bchm3.1992.373.2.675 · DOI
  145. Perazzolli M., 2007, Functional characterization of grape defence genes to improve the biocontrol activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens against Armillaria mellea, IOBC/WPRS Bull., 30, 293
  146. 10.1094/MPMI-23-4-0485 · DOI
  147. 10.1111/j.0032-0862.2004.00999.x · DOI
  148. 10.1007/s11557-009-0590-8 · DOI
  149. 10.3852/09-105 · DOI
  150. 10.1094/Phyto-77-941 · DOI
  151. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00731.x · DOI
  152. 10.1046/j.1437-4781.2003.00339.x · DOI
  153. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2006.00426.x · DOI
  154. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03829.x · DOI
  155. 10.1007/s10658-010-9594-0 · DOI
  156. 10.3852/mycologia.99.3.430 · DOI
  157. 10.3733/hilg.v33n02p025 · DOI
  158. 10.1080/01448765.2003.9755269 · DOI
  159. 10.1080/01448765.2005.9755307 · DOI
  160. 10.1139/x03-065 · DOI
  161. 10.1099/00221287-138-6-1251 · DOI
  162. Reil W., 1997, Walnut Rootstock Evaluation for Resistance to Armillaria Root Rot
  163. 10.1525/9780520339941-031 · DOI
  164. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1982.tb02806.x · DOI
  165. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1985.tb01108.x · DOI
  166. 10.1016/S0007-1536(86)80147-4 · DOI
  167. 10.2307/3760452 · DOI
  168. 10.1099/13500872-140-8-2115 · DOI
  169. 10.1139/b95-085 · DOI
  170. 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.11.1226 · DOI
  171. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1997.tb01361.x · DOI
  172. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1992.tb00787.x · DOI
  173. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1985.tb01039.x · DOI
  174. 10.1007/s00299-003-0664-z · DOI
  175. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1996.00115.x · DOI
  176. 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1331 · DOI
  177. 10.1017/S0953756205003916 · DOI
  178. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1995.tb01005.x · DOI
  179. 10.1248/bpb.31.1410 · DOI
  180. 10.1094/PD-65-972 · DOI
  181. Shaw C.G., 1991, Armillaria Root Disease
  182. 10.1094/Phyto-66-1210 · DOI
  183. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1978.tb01463.x · DOI
  184. Shaw C.G., 1981, Cultural characteristics and pathogenicity to Pinus radiata of Armillaria novae‐zelandiae and A. limonea, N. Z. J. Forest. Sci., 11, 65
  185. 10.1002/bio.1170080403 · DOI
  186. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1987.tb01031.x · DOI
  187. 10.1016/S0953-7562(89)80151-0 · DOI
  188. 10.1038/356428a0 · DOI
  189. 10.1094/Phyto-84-822 · DOI
  190. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1997.tb00866.x · DOI
  191. 10.1007/s10265-009-0268-y · DOI
  192. Termorshuizen A., 1987, On the nomenclature of the European species of the Armillaria mellea group, Mycotaxon, 30, 101, 10.5962/p.416530 · DOI
  193. Thomas H.E., 1934, Studies on Armillaria mellea (Vahl) Quelet: infection, parasitism, and host resistance, J. Agric. Res., 48, 187
  194. Thomas H.E., 1948, Rootstock susceptibility to Armillaria mellea, Phytopathology, 38, 152
  195. 10.1016/S0147-5975(78)80025-5 · DOI
  196. 10.1094/MPMI-22-1-0007 · DOI
  197. 10.1007/s10526-009-9226-9 · DOI
  198. Volk T.J., 1995, A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella Species
  199. 10.2307/3760888 · DOI
  200. 10.2307/3760888 · DOI

200 of 218 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
BAUMGARTNER, K., COETZEE, M. P. A., & HOFFMEISTER, D.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (ZA)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
BAUMGARTNER, KENDRA
ORCID
Venue
Molecular Plant Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-19
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
515-534
ISSN
  • 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-6722
DOI
10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00693.x
PMC
PMC6640247
OpenAlex
W2105263033
Cited by
184
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Molecular Plant Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Armillaria, root diseases, plant pathogenic fungi, fungal taxonomy, host range, plant-fungal symbiosis, orchid endophytes, Gastrodia, soil fumigants, disease control, host resistance, rootstock, secondary metabolites, infection process, host-pathogen interaction
MeSH terms
Geography, Plant Diseases, Plant Roots, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Armillaria, Host Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review