Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,284

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology

Open access
SCHOLTHOF, KAREN‐BETH G., ADKINS, SCOTT, CZOSNEK, HENRYK, PALUKAITIS, PETER, JACQUOT, EMMANUEL, HOHN, THOMAS, HOHN, BARBARA, SAUNDERS, KEITH, CANDRESSE, THIERRY, AHLQUIST, PAUL, HEMENWAY, CYNTHIA, FOSTER, GARY D.·2011·Molecular Plant Pathology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Many scientists, if not all, feel that their particular plant virus should appear in any list of the most important plant viruses. However, to our knowledge, no such list exists. The aim of this review was to survey all plant virologists with an association with Molecular Plant Pathology and ask them to nominate which plant viruses they would place in a ‘Top 10’ based on scientific/economic importance. The survey generated more than 250 votes from the international community, and allowed the generation of a Top 10 plant virus list for Molecular Plant Pathology . The Top 10 list includes, in rank order, (1) Tobacco mosaic virus , (2) Tomato spotted wilt virus , (3) Tomato yellow leaf curl virus , (4) Cucumber mosaic virus , (5) Potato virus Y , (6) Cauliflower mosaic virus , (7) African cassava mosaic virus , (8) Plum pox virus , (9) Brome mosaic virus and (10) Potato virus X , with honourable mentions for viruses just missing out on the Top 10, including Citrus tristeza virus , Barley yellow dwarf virus , Potato leafroll virus and Tomato bushy stunt virus . This review article presents a short review on each virus of the Top 10 list and its importance, with the intent of initiating discussion and debate amongst the plant virology community, as well as laying down a benchmark, as it will be interesting to see in future years how perceptions change and which viruses enter and leave the Top 10.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00752.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,284

Metadata

Authors
SCHOLTHOF, K. G., ADKINS, S., CZOSNEK, H., PALUKAITIS, P., JACQUOT, E., HOHN, T., HOHN, B., SAUNDERS, K., CANDRESSE, T., AHLQUIST, P., HEMENWAY, C., & FOSTER, G. D.
Venue
Molecular Plant Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-21
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
938-954
ISSN
  • 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-6722
OpenAlex
W2118911862
Cited by
1,284
References
0
FWCI
40.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00752.x
The paper
SCHOLTHOF, K. G., ADKINS, S., CZOSNEK, H., PALUKAITIS, P., JACQUOT, E., HOHN, T., HOHN, B., SAUNDERS, K., CANDRESSE, T., AHLQUIST, P., HEMENWAY, C., & FOSTER, G. D. (2011). Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00752.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.