The DOI matches its Crossref record.
One fungus, one name promotes progressive plant pathology
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The robust and reliable identification of fungi underpins virtually every element of plant pathology, from disease diagnosis to studies of biology, management/control, quarantine and, even more recently, comparative genomics. Most plant diseases are caused by fungi, typically pleomorphic organisms, for which the taxonomy and, in particular, a dual nomenclature system have frustrated and confused practitioners of plant pathology. The emergence of DNA sequencing has revealed cryptic taxa and revolutionized our understanding of relationships in the fungi. The impacts on plant pathology at every level are already immense and will continue to grow rapidly as new DNA sequencing technologies continue to emerge. DNA sequence comparisons, used to resolve a dual nomenclature problem for the first time only 19 years ago, have made it possible to approach a natural classification for the fungi and to abandon the confusing dual nomenclature system. The journey to a one fungus, one name taxonomic reality has been long and arduous, but its time has come. This will inevitably have a positive impact on plant pathology, plant pathologists and future students of this hugely important discipline on which the world depends for food security and plant health in general. This contemporary review highlights the problems of a dual nomenclature, especially its impact on plant pathogenic fungi, and charts the road to a one fungus, one name system that is rapidly drawing near.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Senanayake, I. (2020) · Mycosphere · doi:10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20 · Cited by 592
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H. (2013) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3449 · Cited by 328
Wijayawardene, N. N., Crous, P. W., Kirk, P. M., Hawksworth, D. L., Boonmee, S., Braun, U., Dai, D.-Q., D’souza, M. J., Diederich, P., Dissanayake, A., et al. (2014) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-014-0309-2 · Cited by 266
Self-citationMycoBank gearing up for new horizons
Robert, V., Vu, D., Amor, A. B. H., van de Wiele, N., Brouwer, C., Jabas, B., Szoke, S., Dridi, A., Triki, M., Daoud, S. B., et al. (2013) · IMA Fungus · doi:10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.02.16 · Cited by 257
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- WINGFIELD, M. J., DE BEER, Z. W., SLIPPERS, B., WINGFIELD, B. D., GROENEWALD, J. Z., LOMBARD, L., & CROUS, P. W.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 604-613
- ISSN
- 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-6722
- OpenAlex
- W1832864576
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One fungus, one name promotes progressive plant pathology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00768.x
- The paper
- WINGFIELD, M. J., DE BEER, Z. W., SLIPPERS, B., WINGFIELD, B. D., GROENEWALD, J. Z., LOMBARD, L., & CROUS, P. W. (2012). One fungus, one name promotes progressive plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00768.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.