Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of bolus viscosity on swallowing function in neurogenic dysphagia

CLAVÉ, P., DE KRAA, M., ARREOLA, V., GIRVENT, M., FARRÉ, R., PALOMERA, E., SERRA‐PRAT, M.·2006·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Aim: To assess the pathophysiology and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia. Methods: 46 patients with brain damage, 46 with neurodegenerative diseases and eight healthy volunteers were studied by videofluoroscopy while swallowing 3–20 mL liquid (20.4 mPa s), nectar (274.4 mPa s) and pudding (3931.2 mPa s) boluses. Results: Volunteers presented a safe and efficacious swallow, short swallow response (≤740 ms), fast laryngeal closure (≤160 ms) and strong bolus propulsion (≥0.33 mJ). Brain damage patients presented: (i) 21.6% aspiration of liquids, reduced by nectar (10.5%) and pudding (5.3%) viscosity (P < 0.05) and (ii) 39.5% oropharyngeal residue. Neurodegenerative patients presented: (i) 16.2% aspiration of liquids, reduced by nectar (8.3%) and pudding (2.9%) viscosity (P < 0.05) and (ii) 44.4% oropharyngeal residue. Both group of patients presented prolonged swallow response (≥806 ms) with a delay in laryngeal closure (≥245 ms), and weak bolus propulsion forces (≤0.20 mJ). Increasing viscosity did not affect timing of swallow response or bolus kinetic energy. Conclusions: Patients with neurogenic dysphagia presented high prevalence of videofluoroscopic signs of impaired safety and efficacy of swallow, and were at high risk of respiratory and nutritional complications. Impaired safety is associated with slow oropharyngeal reconfiguration and impaired efficacy with low bolus propulsion. Increasing bolus viscosity greatly improves swallowing function in neurological patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03118.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
CLAVÉ, P., DE KRAA, M., ARREOLA, V., GIRVENT, M., FARRÉ, R., PALOMERA, E., & SERRA‐PRAT, M.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-10-16
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1385-1394
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W1986647885
Cited by
474
References
2
FWCI
19.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of bolus viscosity on swallowing function in neurogenic dysphagia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03118.x
The paper
CLAVÉ, P., DE KRAA, M., ARREOLA, V., GIRVENT, M., FARRÉ, R., PALOMERA, E., & SERRA‐PRAT, M. (2006). The effect of bolus viscosity on swallowing function in neurogenic dysphagia. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03118.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.