The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life – a population‐based study
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Background Data on the population epidemiology of dysphagia are scarce. Little is known about the prevalence, risk factors and impact on quality of life of dysphagia in the general community. Aim To determine the magnitude and impact of dysphagia in the general community. Methods A random sample of 1000 individuals of Sydney, Australia, were mailed a validated self‐report questionnaire to assess dysphagia. Measured were dysphagia symptoms, potential mechanisms, risk factors, psychological disorders, quality of life and demographics. Results The response rate of included subjects (n = 926) was 73% (n = 672). Dysphagia ever was reported by 16% (n = 110). Multiple logistic regression analysis found that odynophagia was independently associated with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (OR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.16–10.04). Intermittent dysphagia was independently associated with GERD (OR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.76–4.98) and anxiety (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19). The presence of progressive dysphagia was independently associated with depression (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07–1.67). Progressive dysphagia was independently associated with reduced ‘general health’ (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90–0.99), while intermittent dysphagia was associated with a reduction in the ‘role physical’ subscale (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99). Conclusions Dysphagia is remarkably common in the general population. GERD is a risk factor for dysphagia as well as odynophagia. Intermittent dysphagia was associated with anxiety, while progressive dysphagia was associated with depression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Lindgren, S., & Janzon, L. (1991) · Dysphagia · doi:10.1007/bf02493524 · Cited by 324
Cited by
Validity and Reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)
Belafsky, P. C., Mouadeb, D. A., Rees, C. J., Pryor, J. C., Postma, G. N., Allen, J., & Leonard, R. J. (2008) · Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology · doi:10.1177/000348940811701210 · Cited by 1,751
Baijens, L. W., Clavé, P., Cras, P., Ekberg, O., Forster, A., Kolb, G., Leners, J. C., Masiero, S., Mateos del Nozal, J., Ortega, O., et al. (2016) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s107750 · Cited by 773
The relationship between quality of life and swallowing in Parkinson's disease
Plowman‐Prine, E. K., Sapienza, C. M., Okun, M. S., Pollock, S. L., Jacobson, C., Wu, S. S., & Rosenbek, J. C. (2009) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.22617 · Cited by 233
Hou, J., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Chuang, R., Zhang, H., Zheng, L., Li, H., Xia, N., Ma, Y., Rayan, A. M., et al. (2025) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141319 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- ESLICK, G. D., & TALLEY, N. J.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-27
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 971-979
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W1576023483
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life – a population‐based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03664.x
- The paper
- ESLICK, G. D., & TALLEY, N. J. (2008). Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life – a population‐based study. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03664.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.