Cited by 266Anesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis

Open access
Reynolds, F., Seed, P. T.·2005·Anaesthesia

Abstract

Summary: Spinal anaesthesia is generally preferred for Caesarean section. Its superiority for the baby is often assumed. Umbilical artery acid‐base status provides a valid index of fetal welfare. Twenty‐seven studies reporting neonatal acid‐base data with different types of anaesthesia were used to compare umbilical artery or vein pH and base deficit, using random‐effect meta‐analysis. Cord pH was significantly lower with spinal than with both general (difference: −0.015; 95% CI −0.029 to −0.001; 13 studies, 1272 subjects) and epidural anaesthesia (difference −0.013; 95% CI −0.024 to −0.002; 11 studies, 828 subjects). Larger doses of ephedrine contributed to the latter effect (p = 0.023). Sixteen studies reported a base deficit, which was significantly higher for spinal than for general (difference 1.109; 95% CI 0.434–1.784 mEq.l −1 ; seven studies, 695 subject) and epidural anaesthesia (difference 0.910; 95% CI 0.222–1.598 mEq.l −1 ; seven studies, 497 subjects). Spinal anaesthesia cannot be considered safer than epidural or general anaesthesia for the fetus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a meta-analysis comprising 27 studies, Reynolds and Seed found that spinal anesthesia was associated with a higher degree of fetal metabolic acidemia than was either general or epidural anesthesia.

    “However, in a meta-analysis comprising 27 studies reporting neonatal acid-base data with different types of anesthesia, Reynolds and Seed 46 found that spinal anesthesia was associated with a higher degree of fetal metabolic acidemia than was either general or epidural anesthesia (EDA).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 266

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gokpinar B, 1995, The effect of general and spinal anaesthesia on acid‐base status of newborn and Apgar scoring in elective Caesarean section, Turk Anesteziyoloji Ve Reanimasyon, 23, 297
  2. Swami A, 2004, Comparison of measured and estimated angles of operating table tilt among varying grades of anaesthetists [Abstract], International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 13, S10

Metadata

Authors
Reynolds, F., & Seed, P. T.
Affiliations
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Reynolds, F.
Venue
Anaesthesia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06-16
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
636-653
ISSN
  • 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2044
OpenAlex
W2051287378
Cited by
266
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Tommy's
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
cesarean section, spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, general anesthesia, umbilical cord pH, base deficit, neonatal acid-base status, fetal well-being, obstetric anesthesia
MeSH terms
Acid-Base Equilibrium, Acidosis, Anesthesia, Epidural, Anesthesia, General, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Anesthesia, Spinal, Cesarean Section, Female, Fetal Diseases, Humans, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review