The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling growth and body composition in fish nutrition: where have we been and where are we going?
Open accessAbstract
Mathematical models in fish nutrition have proven indispensable in estimating growth and feed requirements. Nowadays, reducing the environmental footprint and improving product quality of fish culture operations are of increasing interest. This review starts by examining simple models applied to describe/predict fish growth profiles and progresses towards more comprehensive concepts based on bioenergetics and nutrient metabolism. Simple growth models often lack biological interpretation and overlook fundamental properties of fish (e.g. ectothermy, indeterminate growth). In addition, these models disregard possible variations in growth trajectory across life stages. Bioenergetic models have served to predict not only fish growth but also feed requirements and waste outputs from fish culture operations. However, bioenergetics is a concept based on energy-yielding equivalence of chemicals and has significant limitations. Nutrient-based models have been introduced into the fish nutrition literature over the last two decades and stand as a more biologically sound alternative to bioenergetic models. More mechanistic models are required to expand current understanding about growth targets and nutrient utilization for biomass gain. Finally, existing models need to be adapted further to address effectively concerns regarding sustainability, product quality and body traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics
May, R. M. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/261459a0 · Cited by 7,001
Cited by
Lugert, V., Thaller, G., Tetens, J., Schulz, C., & Krieter, J. (2016) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12071 · Cited by 347
Evaluation of spirulina and plant oil in diets for juvenile steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
Twibell, R., Johnson, R., Hyde, N., & Gannam, A. (2020) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735598 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Dumas, A., France, J., & Bureau, D.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-181
- ISSN
- 1355-557X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2109
- OpenAlex
- W2013795088
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling growth and body composition in fish nutrition: where have we been and where are we going? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02323.x
- The paper
- Dumas, A., France, J., & Bureau, D. (2010). Modelling growth and body composition in fish nutrition: where have we been and where are we going? Aquaculture Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02323.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.