Cited by 86Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes Treatment and ManagementBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Regulatory challenges for new drugs to treat obesity and comorbid metabolic disorders

Open access
Heal, David J., Gosden, Jane, Smith, Sharon L.·2009·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Obesity is a major cause of morbidity and mortality through cardio‐ and cerebrovascular diseases and cancer. The metabolic consequences of obesity include dyslipidaemia, hypertension, proinflammatory atherogenesis, pre‐diabetes and Type 2 diabetes. For a significant proportion of patients, pharmacotherapy to tackle obesity is required as adjunctive support to diet, exercise and lifestyle modification. To this end, the pharmaceutical industry is pursuing many novel drug targets. Although this view is probably not justified, the recent tribulations of rimonabant have created a perception that the regulatory bar for the approval of antiobesity drugs has been raised. Although >5% of placebo‐subtracted weight loss maintained over 1 year is the primary efficacy end‐point, it is improvements in cardiovascular risk factors that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) require to grant approval. Safety aspects are also critical in this indication. Many companies are now switching development of their antiobesity drug candidates into other metabolic disorders. Type 2 diabetes is accepted by the industry and FDA, but not EMEA, as the most appropriate alternative. On the other hand, improvements in plasma lipids produced by antiobesity drugs are moderate compared with established therapies, suggesting dyslipidaemia is not a viable development option. Metabolic Syndrome is not accepted by FDA or EMEA as a discrete disease and the agencies will not licence antiobesity drugs for its treatment. The regulatory environment for antiobesity drugs and the spectrum of indications for which they can be approved could change dramatically if positive data for sibutramine emerge from the SCOUT outcome trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03549.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heal, D. J., Gosden, J., & Smith, S. L.
Affiliations
RenaSci (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Heal, David J.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-27
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
861-874
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W2013623792
Cited by
86
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
anti-obesity drugs, drug regulation, regulatory approval, rimonabant, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular risk factors, sibutramine, drug safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Obesity, Risk Factors, Drug Design, Drugs, Investigational, Drug Approval, Anti-Obesity Agents, Metabolic Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review