Cited by 32Genetic and rare skin diseases.Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsGenomics and Rare Diseases

Evidence for genetic homogeneity of Setleis' syndrome and focal facial dermal dysplasia

WARD, K.A., MOSS, C.·1994·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

A healthy 14-month-old boy had multiple, circular, scar-like depressions on both temples, which had been present since birth. Delivery had been normal, and had not required the use of forceps or other instruments. His mother and one sister had similar, but less obvious, lesions on the temples. The three affected family members had similar facial features, with laterally deficient eyebrows, and a prominent upper lip with down-turned mouth. Additional features in the baby were sparse lower eyelashes, medial epicanthal folds, and skin dimpling on one side of the chin. Focal facial dermal dysplasia (FFDD) denotes a condition in which there are bitemporal, round, scar-like lesions. It is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait with variable penetrance and expressivity, and there are no associated features. Setleis' syndrome is recessively inherited, and is characterized by similar bitemporal defects associated with other dysmorphic features, including deficient eyelashes and a prominent upper lip. This report of dominantly inherited bitemporal dermal defects with characteristic facies supports the idea that FFDD and Setleis' syndrome are a single disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb13113.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Setleis and Brauer forms of focal facial dermal dysplasia may be the same entity inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with variable expressivity.

    “Ward and Moss [1994] suggested and Kaplan et al. [1995] concluded that the Setleis (OMIM 227260) and Brauer (OMIM 136500) forms of focal facial dermal dysplasia may be the same entity inherited in an AD inheritance pattern with variable expressivity [Kaplan et al., 1995;Masuno et al., 1995].Irvine [2005] also suggests this possibility and we agree with this opinion.”

    From Ectodermal dysplasias: Clinical and molecular review (2009) · cites this paper as Ward and Moss, 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WARD, K. A., & MOSS, C.
Affiliations
Birmingham Children's Hospital (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
1994-05
Volume
130
Issue
5
Pages
645-649
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2009680526
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
autosomal dominant inheritance, genetic homogeneity, facial dysmorphism, epicanthal folds, variable penetrance
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Eyebrows, Eyelashes, Facial Dermatoses, Female, Humans, Infant, Lip, Male, Phenotype, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review