The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction and validation of a photographic guide for assessing severity of chronic hand dermatitis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A standardized instrument is needed to rate the overall severity of chronic hand dermatitis (CHD), in particular during clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To design and validate a photographic guide. METHODS: Initially, five experts were asked to grade 50 photographs of CHD, first individually, then as a consensus-building group, in order to select the photographs included in the guide. Then, a validation session with 11 different dermatologists evaluating 28 patients was conducted to assess the interrater reliability and test-retest reproducibility of the assessment of disease severity, relying on the photographic guide, on two consecutive days. Patient order was randomized, and only diseased hands were visible to prevent any bias in evaluation. RESULTS: The experts reached a consensus for development of a photographic guide composed of five severity levels and four photographs per severity level. Results of the validation session showed a high level of interrater reliability and test-retest reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The photographic guide is a reliable tool for assessing the morphological severity of hand dermatitis, and can be used as part of a comprehensive evaluation of disease in international multicentre clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
Cited by
Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema
Thyssen, J. P., Schuttelaar, M. L. A., Alfonso, J. H., Andersen, K. E., Angelova‐Fischer, I., Arents, B. W. M., Bauer, A., Brans, R., Cannavo, A., Christoffers, W. A., et al. (2022) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.14035 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Coenraads, P. J., Van Der Walle, H., Thestrup-Pedersen, K., Ruzicka, T., Dreno, B., De La Loge, C., Viala, M., Querner, S., Brown, T., & Zultak, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 296-301
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2133
- OpenAlex
- W2128948746
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construction and validation of a photographic guide for assessing severity of chronic hand dermatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06270.x
- The paper
- Coenraads, P. J., Van Der Walle, H., Thestrup-Pedersen, K., Ruzicka, T., Dreno, B., De La Loge, C., Viala, M., Querner, S., Brown, T., & Zultak, M. (2005). Construction and validation of a photographic guide for assessing severity of chronic hand dermatitis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06270.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
