Cited by 43Dermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Poor agreement between self-reported and dermatologists’ diagnoses for five common dermatoses: Comparison of self-reported and dermatologists’ diagnoses

Jagou, M., Bastuji-Garin, S., Bourdon-Lanoy, E., Penso-Assathiany, D., Roujeau, J-C., the Réseau d'Epidémiologie en Dermatologie (RED)·2006·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Few epidemiological studies assessing the prevalence of chronic dermatosis are available in France and most of these studies have used biased samples drawn from specific subpopulations. As several recent studies have mentioned that self-reported diagnosis either underestimates or overestimates disease prevalence, the validity of such data is questionable. Objectives To evaluate the agreement between self-reported and dermatologists' diagnoses for five chronic dermatoses: acne, eczema, fungal infection, psoriasis and seborrhoeic dermatitis, and to analyse the factors associated with patients' diagnosis knowledge. Patients/methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on the national day of skin tumour screening in April 2003. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by patients and a standard form was completed by dermatologists after clinical examination. A total of 4,622 adults were examined by a dermatologist in 134 screening centres across France. The agreement between self-reported and dermatologists' diagnoses was analysed using the kappa index. Characteristics of patients who were aware of their diagnosis were compared with those of patients who were not, by using multivariate logistic regression models. Results The demographic characteristics of the sample differed from those of the French population. The self-reported prevalence was significantly lower than the actual prevalence for all diseases except eczema. Underestimations ranging from 23% to 35%…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07402.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Poli, 2001, An epidemiological study of acne in female adults: results of a survey conducted in France, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 15, 541, 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2001.00357.x · DOI
  2. Tomb, 2000, Profile of skin diseases observed in a department of dermatology (1995-2000), J Med Liban, 48, 302
  3. Cremer, 1998, Tinea capitis in Créteil. Trends over ten years, Ann Dermatol Venereol, 125, 171
  4. Gérard-Coué, 1994, Enquête sur la participation aux essais thérapeutiques en psychiatrie, Encephale, 20, 421
  5. Blazy, 1993, La population diabétique en France: résultats d'une étude portant sur un panel représentatif, Diabete Metab, 19, 483
  6. Poggi, 1996, Prévalence, traitement et contrôle de l'hypertension artérielle chez les consultants en médecine générale en France en 1994, Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 89, 1075
  7. Wolkenstein, 2003, French people and skin diseases: results of a survey using a representative sample, Arch Dermatol, 139, 1614, 10.1001/archderm.139.12.1614 · DOI
  8. Rea, 1976, Skin disease in Lambeth: a community study of prevalence and use of medical care, Br J Prev Soc Med, 30, 107
  9. Andersson, 1993, Leg and foot ulcer prevalence and investigation of the peripheral arterial and venous circulation in a randomised elderly population. An epidemiological survey and clinical investigation, Acta Derm Venereol, 73, 57, 10.2340/00015555735761 · DOI
  10. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, 2001, Enquête Emploi 2001
  11. Kramer, 1981, Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 29, 111, 10.1038/clpt.1981.18 · DOI
  12. Cook, 1998, Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, 2166
  13. Vach, 2005, The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter, J Clin Epidemiol, 58, 655, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.021 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Nevitt, 1996, Psoriasis in the community: prevalence, severity and patients’ beliefs and attitudes towards the disease, Br J Dermatol, 135, 533, 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1996.d01-1035.x · DOI
  15. Naldi, 2004, Study design and preliminary results from the pilot phase of the PraKtis study: self-reported diagnoses of selected skin diseases in a representative sample of the Italian population, Dermatology, 208, 38, 10.1159/000075044 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jagou, M., Bastuji-Garin, S., Bourdon-Lanoy, E., Penso-Assathiany, D., Roujeau, J.-C., & (RED), T. R. D. E. D.
Affiliations
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor (FR)
Corresponding author
Roujeau, J-C.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2006-06-28
Volume
155
Issue
5
Pages
1006-1012
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085662081
Cited by
43
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Société Française de Dermatologie et de Pathologie Sexuellement Transmissible
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
chronic dermatoses, self-reported diagnosis, dermatologist diagnosis, diagnostic agreement, underestimation of prevalence, acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, fungal skin infection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Diagnostic Errors, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, France, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Self Care, Skin Diseases, Social Class, Observer Variation, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review