The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A study on the epidemiology of rosacea in the U.K.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a chronic facial skin disease of unclear origin. Epidemiological data are scarce and controversial, with reported prevalences ranging from 0·09% to 22%. To our knowledge, incidence rates have not been quantified before. OBJECTIVES: In this observational study we quantified incidence rates of diagnosed rosacea in the U.K. and described demographic characteristics and the prevalence of ocular symptoms in patients with rosacea. We compared lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption between patients with rosacea and controls. METHODS: Using the U.K.-based General Practice Research Database, we identified patients with an incident diagnosis of rosacea between 1995 and 2009 and matched them (1:1) to rosacea-free control patients. We assessed person-time of all patients at risk and assessed incidence rates of rosacea, stratified by age, sex, year of diagnosis and region. RESULTS: We identified 60,042 rosacea cases and 60,042 controls (61·5% women). The overall incidence rate for diagnosed rosacea in the U.K. was 1·65 per 1000 person-years. Rosacea was diagnosed in some 80% of cases after the age of 30 years. Ocular symptoms were recorded in 20·8% of cases at the index date. We observed a significantly reduced relative risk of developing rosacea among current smokers (odds ratio 0·64, 95% confidence interval 0·62-0·67). Alcohol consumption was associated with a marginal risk increase. CONCLUSIONS: We quantified incidence rates and characteristics of patients with rosacea diagnosed in clinical practice in a large epidemiological study using primary care data from the U.K. Smoking was associated with a substantially reduced risk of developing rosacea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agreement between GPRD smoking data: a survey of general practitioners and a population‐based survey
Lewis, J. D., & Brensinger, C. (2004) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.902 · Cited by 80
Cited by
Skin changes in the obese patient
Hirt, P. A., Castillo, D. E., Yosipovitch, G., & Keri, J. E. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.070 · Cited by 182
Tüzün, Y., Wolf, R., Kutlubay, Z., Karakuş, Ö., & Engin, B. (2014) · Clinics in Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.024 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Spoendlin, J., Voegel, J. J., Jick, S. S., & Meier, C. R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-07-23
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 598-605
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162935082
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study on the epidemiology of rosacea in the U.K. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11037.x
- The paper
- Spoendlin, J., Voegel, J. J., Jick, S. S., & Meier, C. R. (2012). A study on the epidemiology of rosacea in the U.K. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11037.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.