The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes
Abstract
New diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of the various myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are proposed, and a detailed description is given of the features that may help define MDS. Five MDS are described: (1) refractory anaemia (RA), (2) RA with ring sideroblasts, (3) RA with excess of blasts (RAEB), (4) chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML), and (5) RAEB 'in transformation'. One of the main distinguishing features of these conditions is the proportion of blast cells in the peripheral blood (PB) and/or bone marrow (BM). The morphological features of the blast cells that are of diagnostic importance have been redefined. In RA, with or without ringed sideroblasts, there are fewer than 1% of blasts in the PB and fewer than 5% in the BM; RAEB is defined as having between 5% and 20% of blasts in the BM and fewer than 5% in the PB; RAEB in transformation (a newly defined category) will be considered when any of the following features is present: (i) more than 5% of blasts in the PB, (ii) 20-30% in the BM, and (iii) the presence of Auer rods in granulocyte precursors in BM or PB. In accordance with these newly defined criteria, it is now proposed that over 30% of bone marrow blasts will suffice for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in any of its forms (M1-M6). The proposed descriptions of the MDS should facilitate the interpretation of data emerging from cytogenetic and bone marrow culture studies and the search for features of possible prognostic significance. Recognition of the new category, RAEB in transformation, may throw light on the pathogenesis of AML.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fenaux, P., Mufti, G. J., Hellstrom-Lindberg, E., Santini, V., Finelli, C., Giagounidis, A., Schoch, R., Gattermann, N., Sanz, G., List, A., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70003-8 · Cited by 2,663
Self-citationKantarjian, H., Issa, J. J., Rosenfeld, C. S., Bennett, J. M., Albitar, M., DiPersio, J., Klimek, V., Slack, J., de Castro, C., Ravandi, F., et al. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21792 · Cited by 1,530
Self-citationNagata, H., Worobec, A. S., Oh, C. K., Chowdhury, B. A., Tannenbaum, S., Suzuki, Y., & Metcalfe, D. D. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.23.10560 · Cited by 872
Valent, P., Akin, C., Escribano, L., Födinger, M., Hartmann, K., Brockow, K., Castells, M., Sperr, W. R., Kluin‐Nelemans, H. C., Hamdy, N. A. T., et al. (2007) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01807.x · Cited by 750
Schanz, J., Tüchler, H., Solé, F., Mallo, M., Luño, E., Cervera, J., Granada, I., Hildebrandt, B., Slovak, M. L., Ohyashiki, K., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.35.6394 · Cited by 688
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, J. M., Catovsky, D., Daniel, M., Flandrin, G., Galton, D. A. G., Gralnick, H. R., & Sultan, C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Haematology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-06-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-199
- ISSN
- 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983392832
- Cited by
- 1,275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1982.tb02771.x
- The paper
- Bennett, J. M., Catovsky, D., Daniel, M., Flandrin, G., Galton, D. A. G., Gralnick, H. R., & Sultan, C. (1982). Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1982.tb02771.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.