Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review of phase‐II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Open access
Glasmacher, Axel, Hahn, Corinna, Hoffmann, Florian, Naumann, Ralph, Goldschmidt, Hartmut, von Lilienfeld‐Toal, Marie, Orlopp, Katjana, Schmidt‐Wolf, Ingo, Gorschlüter, Marcus·2006·British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Summary: The activity of thalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma is widely accepted but not yet demonstrated in a randomised‐controlled trial. A systematic review of the published clinical trials of these patients could reduce the possible bias of single phase‐II studies. A systematic search identified 42 communications reporting on 1674 patients. Thirty‐two trials used an escalating dosing regimen and four a fixed dose regimen (one dose with 50 mg/d, three doses with 200 mg/d). The target dose in the dose escalating trials was 800 mg/d in 17 trials, 400–600 mg/d in 10 and 200 mg/d in one trial. The intention‐to‐treat population for efficacy was 1629 patients with a median age of 62 years. The complete and partial (>50% reduction in monoclonal protein) response rate was 29·4% (95%‐confidence interval, 27–32%). The rates for minor responses or stable disease were 13·8% (12–16%) and 11·0% (9–13%). Progressive disease was reported in 9·9% (8–11%). The median overall survival from all trials was reported at 14 months. Severe adverse events (grade III–IV) included somnolence 11%, constipation 16%, neuropathy 6%, rash 3%, thrombo‐embolism 3%, cardiac 2%. In conclusion, thalidomide monotherapy achieved complete and partial responses in 29·4% of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05914.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Glasmacher, A., Hahn, C., Hoffmann, F., Naumann, R., Goldschmidt, H., von Lilienfeld‐Toal, M., Orlopp, K., Schmidt‐Wolf, I., & Gorschlüter, M.
Venue
British Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-26
Volume
132
Issue
5
Pages
584-593
ISSN
  • 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2141
OpenAlex
W1963909872
Cited by
237
References
1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of phase‐II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05914.x
The paper
Glasmacher, A., Hahn, C., Hoffmann, F., Naumann, R., Goldschmidt, H., von Lilienfeld‐Toal, M., Orlopp, K., Schmidt‐Wolf, I., & Gorschlüter, M. (2006). A systematic review of phase‐II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05914.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.