The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of phase‐II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The activity of thalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma is widely accepted but not yet demonstrated in a randomised‐controlled trial. A systematic review of the published clinical trials of these patients could reduce the possible bias of single phase‐II studies. A systematic search identified 42 communications reporting on 1674 patients. Thirty‐two trials used an escalating dosing regimen and four a fixed dose regimen (one dose with 50 mg/d, three doses with 200 mg/d). The target dose in the dose escalating trials was 800 mg/d in 17 trials, 400–600 mg/d in 10 and 200 mg/d in one trial. The intention‐to‐treat population for efficacy was 1629 patients with a median age of 62 years. The complete and partial (>50% reduction in monoclonal protein) response rate was 29·4% (95%‐confidence interval, 27–32%). The rates for minor responses or stable disease were 13·8% (12–16%) and 11·0% (9–13%). Progressive disease was reported in 9·9% (8–11%). The median overall survival from all trials was reported at 14 months. Severe adverse events (grade III–IV) included somnolence 11%, constipation 16%, neuropathy 6%, rash 3%, thrombo‐embolism 3%, cardiac 2%. In conclusion, thalidomide monotherapy achieved complete and partial responses in 29·4% of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antitumor Activity of Thalidomide in Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Singhal, S., Mehta, J., Desikan, R., Ayers, D., Roberson, P., Eddlemon, P., Munshi, N., Anaissie, E., Wilson, C., Dhodapkar, M., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199911183412102 · Cited by 2,575
Cited by
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
Management of relapsed multiple myeloma: Recommendations of the International Myeloma Working Group
Laubach, J., Garderet, L., Mahindra, A., Gahrton, G., Caers, J., Sezer, O., Voorhees, P., Leleu, X., Johnsen, H. E., Streetly, M., et al. (2016) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2015.356 · Cited by 258
Melchert, M., & List, A. (2007) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2007.01.022 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Glasmacher, A., Hahn, C., Hoffmann, F., Naumann, R., Goldschmidt, H., von Lilienfeld‐Toal, M., Orlopp, K., Schmidt‐Wolf, I., & Gorschlüter, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Haematology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-26
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 584-593
- ISSN
- 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2141
- OpenAlex
- W1963909872
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of phase‐II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05914.x
- The paper
- Glasmacher, A., Hahn, C., Hoffmann, F., Naumann, R., Goldschmidt, H., von Lilienfeld‐Toal, M., Orlopp, K., Schmidt‐Wolf, I., & Gorschlüter, M. (2006). A systematic review of phase‐II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05914.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.