Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cyclin/PCNA immunostaining as an alternative to tritiated thymidine pulse labelling for marking S phase cells in paraffin sections from animal and human tissues

Galand, P., Degraef, C.·1989·Cell Proliferation

Abstract

Abstract Paraffin sections from animal or human tissues fixed in different fixatives were submitted to immunostaining with the mouse monoclonal antibody 19A2, developed by Ogata et al. (1987a) against cyclin/PCNA. Detection of the bound antibody was performed by the indirect method with biotinylated sheep antibody and streptavidin‐biotin‐peroxidase complexes. No, or faint, nuclear staining was seen in material fixed in ethanol, Bouin, Bouin‐Hollande, Carnoy or formaldehyde, whereas readily detectable immunocytochemical reaction was constantly observed over nuclei of methanol‐fixed tissues. Hydrolysis with 2 N HCl prior to immunocytochemistry (as currently performed to render incorporated BrdU accessible to antibodies) somewhat improved the results with Bouin or Carnoy and markedly augmented the intensity of the peroxidase reactions in formaldehyde and in methanol‐fixed tissues. The distribution of the positive nuclei in the two latter cases coincided with the proliferative compartment. On the other hand, double labelling with [3 H]‐thymidine and with the cyclin/PCNA antibody revealed that in methanol‐fixed tissues the cyclin/PCNA labelling index did not differ by more than 6% from the [3 H]‐thymidine index. Besides the two labels overlapped in a proportion of labelled cells that was in reasonable agreement with expectation considering cells flow in and out of S phase since the time of [3 H]‐thymidine injection. This indicates that both labels recognize the same cells in this material. In contrast, in formaldehyde‐fixed tissues, the cyclin/PCNA labelling index markedly exceeded the [3 H]‐thymidine labelling index. From this it is concluded that cyclin/PCNA immunostaining can be used: In formaldehyde‐fixed tissues (including existing material stored as paraffin blocks): for defining and mapping the proliferative (or germinative) compartment. In methanol‐fixed tissues as a substitute to the [3 H]‐thymidine autoradiographic labelling index. From this, a method is proposed (derived from classical ‘double‐labelling’technique) for measuring S phase duration in tissues fixed at a known interval time after a single labelling with [3 H]‐thymidine (or BrdU) and submitted to cyclin/PCNA immunocytochemical detection and to autoradiography (or to BrdU immunostaining).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1989.tb00223.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Galand, P., & Degraef, C.
Venue
Cell Proliferation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-09
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
383-392
ISSN
  • 0960-7722 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2184
OpenAlex
W2080154945
Cited by
288
References
0
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyclin/PCNA immunostaining as an alternative to tritiated thymidine pulse labelling for marking S phase cells in paraffin sections from animal and human tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2184.1989.tb00223.x
The paper
Galand, P., & Degraef, C. (1989). Cyclin/PCNA immunostaining as an alternative to tritiated thymidine pulse labelling for marking S phase cells in paraffin sections from animal and human tissues. Cell Proliferation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.1989.tb00223.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.