The relationship between maternal depression and adverse infant health outcomes in Zambia: a cross-sectional feasibility study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-partum depression affects many new mothers. In the developing world, there may be an association between post-partum depression and adverse mortality-related infant health. Such associations have been found in South Asia; however, findings are inconsistent in Africa. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of such research in rural Zambia, and investigate associations between maternal depression and adverse infant health outcomes. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in a rural district of Zambia. Consecutive women with infants between 2 and 12 months were recruited from under five clinics in three locations. Depression was assessed using the Self-reporting Questionnaire. Outcomes of infant size (actual weight and length, and as ≤ 5th percentile) and infant health (serious illness, diarrhoeal episodes, incomplete vaccination) were obtained. Relative risk, step-wise logistic regression and linear regression were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight of 286 women agreed to take part (97.1%). The proportion with a high risk of depression was 9.7%. Adverse infant health outcomes were all proportionally greater in infants of 'depressed' mothers, and the associations with adjusted mean difference in weight (0.58 kg, CI 0.09-1.08) and length (1.95 cm, CI 0.49-3.50) were statistically significant. Other independent associations with episodes of diarrhoea (maternal education, older infant age, supplementary feeding) and incomplete vaccination (location, older infant age) were identified. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to conduct a study on this subject in a rural area of Zambia. The results show that reduced infant weight and length were significantly associated with maternal 'depression'. Other adverse outcomes may be and need investigating in an appropriately powered study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maternal postpartum depression had a significant effect on stunting.
“Three of the studies110,140,142 showed a significant effect of maternal PPD on stunting.”
From Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as [142]
After adjusting for infant age and other confounders, there was no significant association between high risk of maternal depression and serious illness or diarrheal episodes.
“Only one cross-sectional study reported a nonsignificant association between a high risk of maternal depression and serious illness or diarrheal episodes after adjusting for infant age and other possible confounders.142”
From Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as [142]
The occurrence of serious illness and diarrheal episodes was proportionally higher among infants of depressed mothers.
“Nevertheless, the occurrence of these two outcomes was proportionally higher among infants of depressed mothers.”
From Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as [142]
In low-income populations, maternal PPD seemed to be associated with less infant weight gain and stunting.
“However, in low-income populations, maternal PPD seemed to be associated with less infant weight gain and stunting.97,104,110,131,140,142”
From Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as [142]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Ndokera, R., & MacArthur, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ndokera, R.
- ORCID
- MacArthur, C.
- Venue
- Child: Care, Health and Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-81
- ISSN
- 0305-1862 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1889262261
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Care Health and Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- UNICEF
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- maternal depression, postpartum depression, infant outcomes, low birth weight, infant length, infant diarrhea, incomplete immunization, rural Zambia, feasibility study, maternal mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Body Height, Body Weight, Child Development, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Zambia, Logistic Models, Depression, Postpartum, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review