The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Allergic broncho‐pulmonary aspergillosis: Clinical immunology: (1) Clinical features
Abstract
Summary: In IU out of 143 U.K. patients with pulmonary eosinophilia evidence of allergic broncho‐pulmonary aspergillosis was present, consisting of transitory pulmonary shadows, eosinophilia of blood and sputum. Type I and Type HI reactions to prick and intracutaneous tests respectively with A. fumigatus. Precipitins were present in 92% of sera tested with and without concentration. Sputum plugs usually with pulmonary shadows were present in 56% and contained fungal mycelium, and the sputum gave positive cultures in 58%. Characteristic proximal bronchiectasis was present and fibrosis, mainly of the upper lobes, was found in chronic cases. These features were absent in the patients with no evidence of allergy to A. fumigatus. Patients with early onset of symptoms had a higher atopic status and a much longer interval before pulmonary eosinophilia appeared than those with late onset symptoms. Episodes of pulmonary eosinophilia with aggravation of all symptoms, with fever and positive cultures in 83% for A. fumigatus, were common in the winter months, when there are more spores in the air. Precipitins to one or more of H. influenzae, Str. pneumoniae and Staph. aureus were present in 60% of sputa examined and positive cultures were obtained in 45%, indicating a high incidence of secondary infection. Increasing airways obstruction with decreasing reversibility was common and some had reduction of CO gas transfer factor. Pulmonary hypertension was uncommon. Corticosteroids reduced sputum plugs, positive cultures and hastened resolution of pulmonary shadows. Diagnoses such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, bronchiectasis and carcinoma were not uncommonly made before that of allergic broncho‐pulmonary aspergillosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agarwal, R., Chakrabarti, A., Shah, A., Gupta, D., Meis, J. F., Guleria, R., Moss, R., Denning, D. W., & ABPA complicating asthma ISHAM working group (2013) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/cea.12141 · Cited by 896
Clinical and Immunologic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis
ROSENBERG, M., PATTERSON, R., MINTZER, R., COOPER, B. J., ROBERTS, M., & HARRIS, K. E. (1977) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-86-4-405 · Cited by 819
Fungal allergy in asthma-state of the art and research needs
Denning, D. W., Pashley, C., Hartl, D., Wardlaw, A., Godet, C., Del Giacco, S., Delhaes, L., & Sergejeva, S. (2014) · Clinical and Translational Allergy · doi:10.1186/2045-7022-4-14 · Cited by 357
Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis: Staging as an Aid to Management
PATTERSON, R., GREENBERGER, P. A., RADIN, R. C., & ROBERTS, M. (1982) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-96-3-286 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- McCARTHY, D. S., & PEPYS, J.
- Venue
- Clinical & Experimental Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1971-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-286
- ISSN
- 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2034836849
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Allergic broncho‐pulmonary aspergillosis: Clinical immunology: (1) Clinical features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1971.tb00779.x
- The paper
- McCARTHY, D. S., & PEPYS, J. (1971). Allergic broncho‐pulmonary aspergillosis: Clinical immunology: (1) Clinical features. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1971.tb00779.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.