The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IgE antibodies to bee venom, phospholipase A, melittin and wasp venom
Abstract
Summary: Specific IgE antibodies against bee venom, phospholipase A, melittin and wasp venom have been examined in fifty patients with an unusually severe reaction after bee or wasp sting. Two thirds of the bee venom‐sensitive patients also have detectable IgE antibodies to wasp venom. More than 50% of the wasp venom‐sensitive patients are also allergic to bee venom. Phospholipase A and melittin IgE antibodies were found, respectively, in two thirds and one third of the bee venom‐sensitive cases. Specific IgE antibody determinations by the Radioallergosorbent test play an essential role in the diagnostic work. After a reaction to hymenoptera stings both bee and wasp venom tests are necessary due to the high incidence of a false or incomplete identification of the stinging insect. Melittin, known for its potent pharmacological activity and possibly responsible for most of the side effects in bee venom immunotherapy, can probably not be excluded from therapeutic venom preparations since IgE antibodies to the melittin preparation were detected in one third of the cases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such envenomation not only provokes an innate inflammatory response and pathology related to the biological activities of the venoms’ toxins [86–88], but also can induce allergic sensitization associated with the development of specific IgE antibodies [89–94].”
From Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy (2020) · cites this paper as [91]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1016/0021-8707(65)90163-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1976.tb01945.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-6749(76)90201-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-6749(77)90217-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-6749(77)90019-7 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197807272990401 · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-6749(76)90006-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9861(76)90121-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-6749(76)90138-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-6749(77)90158-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1978.tb03223.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-6749(76)90111-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-6749(77)90056-2 · DOI
- Rhoades R.B., 1978, Cross‐reacting antigens between imported fire ants and other hymenoptera species, Annuls of Allergy, 40, 100
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1971.tb01414.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90436-2 · DOI
- Urbanek R.&Karizky D.(1972)Die diagnostischen und therapeutischen Probleme der Insektenstichallergie.Kongreßband. 1. Kölner RAST‐Symposium 7–9 April 1978 Köln.
- Vick J.A., 1972, Pharmacological studies of the major fractions of bee venom, American Bee Journal, 112, 288
- 10.1016/0091-6749(78)90231-2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mast cells and IgE in defense against venoms: Possible “good side” of allergy?
Galli, S. J., Starkl, P., Marichal, T., & Tsai, M. (2016) · Allergology International · doi:10.1016/j.alit.2015.09.002 · Cited by 73
Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy
Galli, S. J., Metz, M., Starkl, P., Marichal, T., & Tsai, M. (2020) · Allergo Journal International · doi:10.1007/s40629-020-00118-6 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- JARISCH, R., YMAN, L., BOLTZ, A., SANDOR, I., & JANITSCH, A.
- Venue
- Clinical & Experimental Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-541
- ISSN
- 0954-7894
- 1365-2222
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IgE antibodies to bee venom, phospholipase A, melittin and wasp venom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb02518.x
- The paper
- JARISCH, R., YMAN, L., BOLTZ, A., SANDOR, I., & JANITSCH, A. (1979). IgE antibodies to bee venom, phospholipase A, melittin and wasp venom. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb02518.x