Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A research method to induce and examine a mild exacerbation of asthma by withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroid

GIBSON, P. G., WONG, B. J. O., HEPPERLE, M. J. E., KLINE, P. A., GIRGIS‐GABARDO, A., GUYATT, G., DOLOVICH, J., DENBURG, J. A., RAMSDALE, E. H., HARGREAVE, F. E.·1992·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: This study evaluated a research method to examine an exacerbation of asthma induced by corticosteroid withdrawal. Ten non‐smoking adult asthmatics who were stable on treatment with inhaled steroid underwent a graded reduction of the daily dose by 200 μg at weekly intervals until an exacerbation of symptoms occurred. A daily symptom, peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) and medication diary was kept. Weekly clinic visits were used to assess symptoms, spirometry, methacholine airway responsiveness (expressed as the provocative concentration to cause a fall in FEV 1 of 20%, PC 20), circulating eosinophils, basophils and their progenitors (Eo/B‐CFU), and sputum inflammatory cells. The laboratory tests were performed blind to the clinical details. Each subject developed an exacerbation of symptoms, on average at 16 (70–26) days after the onset of steroid reduction. This was accompanied by a deterioration in each of the objective measures. There was a fall in FEV 1 by 320 ml (s.e.m. 9.5) and in PC 20 from 0.8 to 0.43 mg/ml. Circulating eosinophils rose from 114 (24) × 10 3/ml to 227 (50) × 10 3/ml and Eo/B‐CFU rose from 31 (5.6) to 44(11.3)/10 6 cells. Sputum developed in five subjects and contained 36 (5.2)% eosinophils and 1.98 (0.21)% metachromatic cells (mast cells or basophils). The symptom diary and weekly questionaire were demonstrated to be valid and responsive to change. A deterioration indicated by the daily symptom score preceded changes in PEF. Treatment by an increase in steroid was followed by reversal of each of the changes. We conclude that this research method can safely produce and examine a mild exacerbation of asthma, and that an increase in airway inflammation is an early feature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb00161.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
GIBSON, P. G., WONG, B. J. O., HEPPERLE, M. J. E., KLINE, P. A., GIRGIS‐GABARDO, A., GUYATT, G., DOLOVICH, J., DENBURG, J. A., RAMSDALE, E. H., & HARGREAVE, F. E.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-05
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
525-532
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2149725533
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A research method to induce and examine a mild exacerbation of asthma by withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb00161.x
The paper
GIBSON, P. G., WONG, B. J. O., HEPPERLE, M. J. E., KLINE, P. A., GIRGIS‐GABARDO, A., GUYATT, G., DOLOVICH, J., DENBURG, J. A., RAMSDALE, E. H., & HARGREAVE, F. E. (1992). A research method to induce and examine a mild exacerbation of asthma by withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroid. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb00161.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.